Posted:
Originally posted by: shaistas
I cannot understand how some people are so insensitive. A baby is "third person" between two people who love each other? r u serious? a baby isa sign of the love between two people. and they have been married for 2 years now thats about average for India. I mean Ridhima was married half the time and she lost her baby too. Also if a man and womans love becomes discounted by a child then their love is not true. Think about it. If their love will be less with a child then that love is nothing. I would actually enjoy a child track. obviously now anu will have more rona dhona but that is normal when a woman is losing a child and also told she will never have more children.
we r not getting insensitive its u who is getting so. u need 2b practical. third person will remain third person only, no matter who he/she is (as he will hav his own brain n priorities)...n accept it or not priorities of couple changes after baby comes. no child moves wid a tag tat he/she is sign of luv he'll hav his own demands...ever1 can be shown happy wid kids n all but more important thing is Danu's love shud remain strong for each other even widout kids, and in any n every condition (n this is what cratives want to show). and telling you more specifically most of the shows lose their charm after all this baby stuffs. ever1 enjoys watchin chemistry of two people who r in love but no1 enjoys watching track of parents n baby, accept it (atleast I will never like such booooring tracks🤢) also no one can show a good story wid baby in picture. sooner or later couples r shown figting due to baby its a fact wch is xtremely irritating to watch, its better if show proceeds widout it (atleast for Daksh-Anu coz they r too young to be shown as parents). so stop getting emotional n give it a practical thought.
am i wrong ppl?
Tum Se Tum Tak
Cricket
Sports
