Mera Confusion Solve Karo! - Page 3

Originally posted by: nitica_82

Now, comes the confusion part…….what exactly did Prithvi mean by telling Kripa that they were apart from each-other and very different from normal husband and wife? Does this mean that the infamous consummation scene was Angad's wild imagination? Was Kripa unable to go through it and it didn't happen? Or does Prithvi feel that inspite of getting conjugal rights, Kripa still belongs to Angad and will never be his? Ekta's suspense is always a bout of Migraine for me. What does this actually mean?

Hey actually galpal and Kismet noticed that too.....They kept insisting that the consummation scene was Angad's dream sequence....... I dismissed it as a mere figment of imagination.....

But a second look at the episode......They were probably right......

However the broken bangles part looked true......

Originally posted by: nitica_82

Now, comes the confusion part…….what exactly did Prithvi mean by telling Kripa that they were apart from each-other and very different from normal husband and wife? Does this mean that the infamous consummation scene was Angad's wild imagination? Was Kripa unable to go through it and it didn't happen? Or does Prithvi feel that inspite of getting conjugal rights, Kripa still belongs to Angad and will never be his? Ekta's suspense is always a bout of Migraine for me. What does this actually mean?

Hi Nitica! How are you? Are you done reading ?(specially chemistry and language arts😉😉)👏. You are too good at it!

OK. Here is what I interpreted.

When Prithvi called Kripa for dinner, Kripa lied that she has rehearsal and went to meet Angad/Zaib (Zeb for you😉😆).

Wife will lie or hide the matter from the husband only when there is a distance between the two hearts even if they are married legally (or whatever way you take it after Friday's episode).

When he came to Rm.102, Zaib proved that there was no rehearsal. So Kripa had to come out with the truth. So Prithvi was hurt that Kripa had hidden/lied to him and the reason being Zaib. That is why he said, "there should not be so much of distance between husband and wife (to the extent that you lie/hide) that any third person like Zaib comes in between (rather take advantage and create further rift)".

Now, he is fearing that, even if Kripa is with him (legally in every way), she may be lying about her concern for Angad and the love for Angad. He wanted his own place in her heart, but he is scared that even now it is not so and only Angad has completely occupied that place.

One thing I like to add on my own here: as soon as P caught K telling lie red handed, he felt that she may be lying (Friday's dialogue between P&K) in other matters like Angad and her love for Angad also. The same is Simone-Angad-Kripa case. K had experienced/witnessed Angad's relation with women and so easily she accepted the acceptance by Angad regarding Simone's relation on that night.

If you look at the way his face was disturbed while hugging K and the way he was sitting, he is disturbed regarding K.

Angad tried to create mis-understanding between Kripa and Prithvi by letting her purposely know that he was meeting Mishty in 102, so that she will come there (he knew that she will come) and he had also arranged for Prithvi to come there. That is the reason, he was mocking at her, when P-K confronted in a very delicate situation. When P was disgusted and walked away, he thought, he created a rift between them. But, when he heard from P that the mis-understanding or distance brought them even closer and the husband-wife relation is such, he felt, "how is that possible. This time I thought I have done it. This time too, she escaped, but instead, P-K came much closer. My idea back-fired like last time".

At least, this is what I think! May be I am wrong!

ok... u and H are both on the same wavelength here and that got me thinking : maybe kripa has lied abt her 'do' with P : And she is just torturing Angad with the rite acting, dialogues and yes ( those bangles on the bed) the rite props: If that is tru .... then hats off to kripa: she has taken the cake : she truly can drive angad mad with his crazed jealousies abt what she supposedly did.

On a diff note : Nits --- I sooooo hope u r rite... that kripa hasnt really been soiled by that murderers touch . And angad will still find a way to forgive her once all the fighting is over and done with.

Originally posted by: nitica_82

Now, comes the confusion part…….what exactly did Prithvi mean by telling Kripa that they were apart from each-other and very different from normal husband and wife? Does this mean that the infamous consummation scene was Angad's wild imagination? Was Kripa unable to go through it and it didn't happen? Or does Prithvi feel that inspite of getting conjugal rights, Kripa still belongs to Angad and will never be his? Ekta's suspense is always a bout of Migraine for me. What does this actually mean?

well i feel that prithvi in his mind and heart knows that u cant force a person to love ... u can keep him/her with u but can make them love u........

hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm nitica good analysis re. i also watcg this . most probably p-k was not consummeted, may be its angads's dream

Originally posted by: buttercup

Prithvi was drunk he didnt know what hapend.. he woke up in the morning misunderstandings were solved

I don't think it was Angad's dream. I really think the consumation happenned.😊. I think Prithvi was so much drunk tht he doesn't remembers wht happenned.Ekta has used the same kind of this in Kkavyanjali so maybe she can do this here.😃. If the consumations din't happen why did Kripa wear sindoor and the breaking of bangles were looking real

PS- Nitoo welcum back with your awesum analysis. 👏😉Hope your confusion is little less.😃