pls provide some JUSTIFIED/LOGICAL ANSWERS!!!

Can somebody provide me wid justified & logical answers???

1. Wat was d need of bringing bhimu & suddenly killing him ?

2. did the character of sakshi ( which was one of d prime characters ) had any importance? Same goes for dharam's mom, sia's parents

3. Why was Tasha's re- entry shown if he didn't get to play in more dan 4 episodes?

4. Why Nivs stayed in Aryanagar when she was d queen of the other kingdom

5. the total plot of DV other dan frndship was based on caste system(sort of) but in India I suppose this type of class system never existed .If I am not wrong this type of caste system (with monarchy) was found in Western countries dat too in Medieval Age.

Caste system was dere like Kshatriyas, Brahmins etc.

But in DV its clearly mentioned "Hindustan" be it a fictitious drama but time & place factor is v much non fictitious.

6. When slaves & monarchy type class system was existent in India or any other parts of the world Tribal groups didn't have so much importance & power as shown in DV I suppose.

7. Veer is a shramik by birth so Pari may not have any probs to accept Shera as daughter–in-law but how come Nivs & Arya accepted it coz in 13^th century or round dat time Royals were v v strict abt marriage in same community & all.

8. dharam is gng around wid Sia & veer wid shera but the brides were not introduced formally to the guardians. Sia was the guest also, & shera helped Veer in everything.& dis thing was v much known to the guardians but they didn't bother to ask d sons wats the matter? Even When Sia came to Aryanagar for d first time, nobody was curious to knw dat where did Dh, find Sia how did they meet?? Etc etc.

Whereas at dat time the Royals were v particular about their family values , customs & society!! Shera is a decoit, dis matter can b overlooked in her case but Veer?? Nivs saw Veera were going to gazni & it takes two days but she didn't ask a single ques to Veer.

9.Sia is not even 0.01% curious to knw why shera became Ananya at the mela & d whole story.whereas being a gal I knw these things are obvious for a gal mean the curiosity & all.

10. Tasha accepted d defeat so easily? I mean he didn't even bother to inform Sardar dat Shera is with Veer in d ashram & v much tilted 2wards him & both are heading to gazni

11. veer suddenly forgot & the slaves also dat he is d messiah?

Originally posted by: subha2601

1. Wat was d need of bringing bhimu & suddenly killing him ?
Bhimu always inspred d shramiks 2 fight 4 their rights as noone among d shramiks were as brave and revolutionary like bhimu,ek kranti tha par woh bhi mar gaya to bacha sirf bhimu,he always inspired d shramiks 2 fight against d aryavrats,he was killed b'coz sagars thought that as veer has become a shramik,ab bimu ka koi kaam nahi hai so let us kill his character. Koi kaam nehi??? waah saagars waah



2. did the character of sakshi ( which was one of d prime characters ) had any importance? Same goes for dharam's mom, sia's parents
Sakshi was always shown as waiting 4 veer,she too was revolutionary,i guess d actress mite hv decided 2 leave d show that's why they ended her role.
I too don't know why dharam's mom suddenly disappeared,maybe that actress mite hv also left d show and regarding sia's parents,as time bahut kam tha,show ko jaldi khatam karna tha shayad isliye they didn't bring bak sia's parents.In that case,even shera's dad is also gayab and they didn't even show shera leaving her dad. Baccho ki shaadi & parents gayab!! ?


3. Why was Tasha's re- entry shown if he didn't get to play in more dan 4 episodes?
I too was wondering why did they bring bak tasha,i guess they did this so that veer teaches a good lesson to tasha. may b he came 2 play d cupid only!!!



4. Why Nivs stayed in Aryanagar when she was d queen of the other kingdom
I think as she had become d widow so her father in law ne usse chhod diya hoga,in olden days widows were alway treated badly,that mite be d reason. but i guess she gave birth 2 a child so d kingdom needs its heir kya director hai??

5. the total plot of DV other dan frndship was based on caste system(sort of) but in India I suppose this type of class system never existed .If I am not wrong this type of caste system (with monarchy) was found in Western countries dat too in Medieval Age.




But in DV its clearly mentioned "Hindustan" be it a fictitious drama but time & place factor is v much non fictitious.
I think this is also sort of a caste system,the aryavrats were like kshatriyas(higher caste) and d shramiks were lower caste.
but i guess dis type of class system was found in medieval Europe!!




6. When slaves & monarchy type class system was existent in India or any other parts of the world Tribal groups didn't have so much importance & power as shown in DV I suppose.
In dv,they hv shown tribals always staying on outskirts and hv no pehchaan,is shera a tribal?Did they show anywhere that she is a tribal?
haa,, woh tha naa aswahi bhil!!??

7. Veer is a shramik by birth so Pari may not have any probs to accept Shera as daughter?in-law but how come Nivs & Arya accepted it coz in 13th century or round dat time Royals were v v strict abt marriage in same community & all.
If they can accept shramik veer as their family member then why can't they accept dakoo shera as their daughter in law now that she has changed herself and has mended herself.That shows aryavrats r not bad persons and they too hv a heart. ⭐️



8. dharam is gng around wid Sia & veer wid shera but the brides were not introduced formally to the guardians. Sia was the guest also, & shera helped Veer in everything.& dis thing was v much known to the guardians but they didn't bother to ask d sons wats the matter? Even When Sia came to Aryanagar for d first time, nobody was curious to knw dat where did Dh, find Sia how did they meet?? Etc etc.


Whereas at dat time the Royals were v particular about their family values , customs & society!! Shera is a decoit, dis matter can b overlooked in her case but Veer?? Nivs saw Veera were going to gazni & it takes two days but she didn't ask a single ques to Veer.
Well d characters of this show r quite broad minded and modern u know. kuch zaada hi mod hai1!


9.Sia is not even 0.01% curious to knw why shera became Ananya at the mela & d whole story.whereas being a gal I knw these things are obvious for a gal mean the curiosity & all.
This is another big blooper of d show,maybe b'coz they don't hv time 2 show everything. ⭐️⭐️⭐️



10. Tasha accepted d defeat so easily? I mean he didn't even bother to inform Sardar dat Shera is with Veer in d ashram & v much tilted 2wards him & both are heading to gazni
Tasha's role got over after veer taught him a lesson. 😆😆😆

11. veer suddenly forgot & the slaves also dat he is d messiah?

WAT SAY??
b'coz he realised that d aryarats r his everything,he had gone 2 d shramiks 2 give their rights,he never loved shramiks as much as he loved d aryavrats,he realised he can't leave without d aryavrats that's why he came bak 2 them.

U shd hv added another question,how come all d shramiks and specially pari allowed veer 2 go bak 2 d aryavrats,does anybody has this answer? yep!!!!

ha ab shayad oonka kaam ho gaya hai so masihe ki koi zaroorat nehi!!😆😆


__________________

Originally posted by: Aradhana87

Nice question and answers. I think most of them are unanswered in this serial because of the sudden end. I think if they did not lack time, most of these questions would have been answered and I think they re introduced Tasha for another storyline but they could not develop it as they had to wrap up the serial.

seriously i think veer was only attached to pari & shramiks coz of his responsibility but he is totally dharam's bro & nivs son!!!

& regarding nivs i guess its just shown coz when a queen is abt to give birth to a baby ,,an heir 2 d throne its totally illogical to show dat she is abandoned!!