The warriors of Lanka

all the warriors mentioned(in this poll) die in the battle field or while engaged in a duel, except that some versions of Ramayana mention Lakshman killing Meghnaad in an unfair way. but if Valmiki's version , Kamban's version and Ramcharitmanas are to be considered then Meghnaad died fighting in a fair battle.

Tell me how do we analyse Lakshman killing Atikaya is better or killing Meghnaad was better??😔 if so there are no parametrs given and (that can't be determined also) , like: time taken by Lakshman to fell his enemy or Number of special astras used etc.

Both Atikaya and Meghnaad die a heroic death at the hands of Lakshman.

My aim is not to offend you in any way, but sorry,; frankly I didn't get this!

to me, Meghnad was an evil person..

i can't remember anything because i watched ramanaya when i was a little kid 😕

Meghnad was the first son of Ravan born of his first queen, Mandodari. When he was born, his birth cries made the sound of thunder. Hence, he was named Meghnad. He married the daugther of Sesh-Nag, the Naga princess Sulochana, who was a virtuous devoted wife whose virtue and faith in her husband earned her fame.

Due to severe tapasya, Meghnad received all the magical weapons, such as the Brahmastra and such, and he became even more powerful than his father, Ravana.

Once, Lord Indra received a curse from someone that he would he defeated by a rakshasa, and later on, Indrajit defeated him in a battle with the devas, and won Indra-Lok, making Lord Indra a vessel king to Ravan. Thus he received the title Indrajit.

When Ravan kidnapped Sitaji, Indrajit, who realized later on that Ravan would be killed for his sin, still sided with his father, because he felt that serving one's father should be one's utmost duty, even if the said father was an adharmi.

In a fair fight, Lakshmanji killed Indrajit, after being defeated by him twice (once by a naaga weapon, and the second time by the Shakti Weapon). It was prophesied that one who was twice defeated by Indrajit, but survived both encounters, would be the one to kill him.

Shri Ram appreciated Indrajit's valour, and his devotion to his father, so when the vanar army suggested that they mutilate Indrajit's dead body and send it to Ravan, Shri Ram chastised them and told them that after death, one's enemy ceases to be an enemy, because the soul already left, and the dead body should be treated with respect. So he placed his own cloth over Indrajit in a sign of respect for a warrior who fell doing his duty (and who thus achieved heaven), and sent the body like that to Ravan, so that Indrajit can get a proper funeral.

Can someone please post the speech Shri Ram gave to the Vanar-Sena about respecting Indrajit's corpse? I remember that it was posted somewhere, but I don't recall the exact spot.

Watch this video of Indrajit from the old Ramayan. It will tell you why we respect him, even if he was the son of Ravan.

Indrajit died doing his duty, much like Karna from the Mahabharat, so even if he was on the evil side, he died a noble death and received a place in heaven, like Karna.