History.....history........history

I think the judges are being 'over generous' by giving 'history' to above average performances. History should only given to performances which will be remembered by everyone e.g Raja's Allah ke Bande, Mauli's maya maya etc.

Originally posted by: niruba

I think the judges are being 'over generous' by giving 'history' to above average performances. History should only given to performances which will be remembered by everyone e.g Raja's Allah ke Bande, Mauli's maya maya etc.

I was suprised when all judges gave Asma a 'history'. Don't tell me Asma's singing was as good as Soumen's or Sara's......yes I agree she was better this time but does she deserve 'history'? I think it's very unfair to the other singers who got hit or superhit when they were better than Asma.........don't get me wrong, I don't hate Asma, actually I never hated any reality show singers, I'm just being very honest here..........

And one more thing....Urmila does not deserve History either 😆 😆 😆!!!

Zee should change this hit-superhit-history rating format......it does not diffrentiate better and best performance!

Originally posted by: Your King Anu

at appropriate time asma will be history not get history

Originally posted by: Summer3

Yes Kingji in time all must go.😆

I wonder if there is such a thing called a fair fight. This contest seem to favour an all rounder rather than someone who is good in a particular song genre.

Originally posted by: m_khan90

I think they do to encourage a contestant. Asma is trying hard to improve and she does improve a lot as Pretamji said. She deserves to be encouraged by giving history.

Originally posted by: mbharat2007

Your thinking is flawed -

(1) Asma has improved. SO WHAT? This is a serious competition, not a place for beginners like Asma! It does not matter whether she is singing better than how she sang when the competition began. What the mentors should look at is whether her singing today is good enough for the level at which the contest is today! Asma may have improved but she still is not good enough for the tournament at this level. Let her practice more at home and qualify again next year. Sarepamapa is not a learning platform!

(2) Yes, the mentors may encourage a participant. But reaping disproportionate praises (HISTORY-HISTORY-HISTORY) is NOT ENCOURAGEMENT, BUT a FAVOUR and INJUSTICE to other competitors. After all, what mentors say will definitely affect the voters. The mentors should remain consistent and If Asma's singing today was history, all other contestants who sing the same quality as Asma should be given HISTORY everytime!

There is a strong reason to believe that the mentors have received huge incentives from Asma's rich father to continue praising her rubbish performances! SAREGAMAPA is heading down the drain!