Originally posted by: Me_Harini
I slightly disagree. I think the earlier episodes establishing Parth as Tanya's son might actually have been the blooper.
When Nandini shot Parth in yesterdays episode she immediately remembered the embryo. If Parth was Tanya's biological son, why would Nandini's flashback begin with the embryo? They never showed Nandini giving birth but they did show the progression from the embryo to a baby in the crib which strongly suggests he is Nandinis biological son...this also aligns with S1 canon.
So either the earlier episodes identifying Parth as Tanya's son were a continuity error, or today's embryo flashback is the inconsistency.
I think Parth bring Tanya's son was a blooper. Yesterday's episode proved he's Nandini's biological son: they clearly showed baby Parth growing in her womb flashback too. They couldn't make it anymore clear.
71