Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 41 - Page 125

Again, just clarifying. I am not anybody's team. I like only Mannat's character slightly better. Then DK's. I can related to them. Not the story, or the ML.

I still think they can tranform their ML, but the sheer audacity with which they are writing trash is amusing to me! I am here to just analyze their writing....i m not here to contest anyone's opinion. So ignore me. My intention is not to provoke anyone but lay down my opinion. Thats why I stopped tagging people. I dont expect anyone to read my posts as well. :)

I like to express and write. Thats all. Dont think that I am going against anyone's judgement. Really not my intention

Originally posted by: sadiltl

I am watching only BTS. They have entire episodes there.

I watched Ayesha's clip. She is rocking as usual in these scenes. She got very good training in emotionally lengthy scenes.

So now the situation is like this

Vikrant wants Mannat by scaring and making her terrorused by filing a full custody of Dua. He should have a bullying case against him. Because at present he is not only acting like a negative character but also like an animal. A selfish animal who respects none, has zero respect for other's feelings or safety. I wonder is this even love. Because love means caring , respecting , sacrificing for the person you love. The way his character is built up he is a pain in ass now. Not a lover but a pain in ass. At this position in reality a girl with dignity will lose every feeling for a ass hole like him and find another man. Because life can't be possible with a thing like him.

Congrats makers...you have ruined Vikrant.

Originally posted by: sadiltl

If you think I am saying this because I love Vik and will accept any of his idiosyncrasies then you have not met me

Or rather please discuss this with people who have silently blacklisted me

I have never said Vik shouldn't have a redemption or he should get Mannat and Dua just by the virtue of it. Mujhe to DK ke negative banne se bhi problem hai re 😑 sirf isliye ki Vik will end up looking better without doing much.

I have been against this idea of custody ever since it came as spoiler. I dont see the logic of it as of now except the writers probably want something legal on Viks side to fight DK if he ever turns negative fully 😐. Thats the only reason why I see Vik would get custody. And yeah they made Neetu trap DK in a false case of bribery so Vik looks better.

I was raising a point based on your previous comments. And I clearly mentioned its only from DK and Viks reference... not Dua or Mannat. Dua ke liye I already mentioned it's not easy to make her understand anything. Mannat is worried for the same .

Keep Viks mistakes aside for a moment... surely they need an independent discussion.

If DK is morally Duas father, so is Vik. He is not a bad fellow in general. He has his traits which are wrong, but he is not a criminal like Aish, nor tried to kill Dua (which is the point Mannat was making).

And he didnt knew which is the loophole they have always kept for him.

He loves Dua and has bonded with her. Same as DK.

Mannat has never badmouthed Vik in front of Dua or has mentioned his previous kaands so that Dua forms an independent opinion of him.

I support DK when its about Dua...

But if Vik has to agree to be a 'space' in Duas life... so can DK... even he should acknowledge that Vik deserves to be there. We dont see that from DK and hence he is looking grey.

That's the moral part of it... Agar morality question karni hai to dono se karo.

Even you agree that if Vik redeems then he can be with Mannat and Dua... isnt that what everyone else is asking too????

I dont believe simply cohabiting with anyone will give you rights. By that logic, what happens in a joint family if the woman is living in a marital home but her husband is absent or dead???? Will the uncles/inlaws get rights????

And Mannat here is not living with DK alone... when you say live in relationship it implicitly means the adults are in conjugal relationship and the child is born out of that relationship... thats so not the case here.... and theres also RoTu who can decide for Dua. If DK hadnt been around, would Ronnie be termed as father just because he cohabits????

As far as I know... Uncles/inlaws can only be legal guardians (till adulthood) even if both parents are dead. I know this from personal experience... once that child attains adulthood... he/she is an independent person. He/she can still cohabit but not legally obligated to anything.

I think this guardianship is only to protect the child till he/she becomes an adult capable of making his/her own decisions.

In this shows case, Mannat could have still written Viks name on birth certificate but continued with DK as father for pretense purposes. Dua wouldnt have known. Thats the point Shiro was raising. Its wrong on her part and nobody has supported that idea... even solo fans.

And its not even forgery because it is not a fake certificate either. Its misinformation in proper terms. If tomm, the judge punishes Mannat and asks it to be corrected (like Nuts says) DK will lose that claim too.

Thats what I mean by legal standing. DK doesnt have anything whereas Vik will get it purely on biology.

Lets not bring Sai here... post leap Sai/Ghum did many mistakes which I dont agree to and I dont want to get into an argument with you on that.

A lot of illegal questionable stuff happened in name of creative liberty there too which we ignored (after complaining 🤦‍♀️ and not getting anything).

I stand by that statement....

I will prefer a dumb ML than a cruel ML

Thats what they are still writing Vik as... .. why they dont want to make him smart is something I cant answer

What I mean and you might find in another reply is the story has not ended... abhi to start hua hai Vik ka so called redemption... he hasnt even begun yet... to abhi se assumptions kyun bana rahe hai hum 🤔

You dont like the writing... thats fine... not judging for it... I am putting across some thoughts which you may have missed since you are not a regular watcher.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Mera point jo tha woh judge ne bol diya. So I am happy with my assessment which aligned with the what is being shown.

Baki yeh leads ka maut ka nanga nach is not what I signed up for and which is why I stopped watching for a long time. Abhi they are at loggerheads isliye I am watching.

And I do agree with you ki it is as simple as correcting the birth certificate

Which is a legal process BTW 🤣🤣🤣

Hypothetical scenario

If Mannat and Vikrant can come to a consensus that they married legally in a mandir or something and claim that wedding... wouldn't it change everything????

Kahi se bribe deke papers bhi bana lenge... 🤦‍♀️

No other character knows when these 2 got married and how ... but if they both agree to lie for Duas legitimacy... who can question it???

This is what I mean by 'he said' vs 'she said'.

Right now they are at loggerheads... kal ko patchup ho gaya and ek common decision pe aagaye to ye sab jo discussion hum kar rahe hai vo dhara ka dhara reh jayega...

Would be morally compromised leads but Dua would be legitimate..

Creative liberty for the win 🙈🙈🙈