Dhurandhar 2 - The meltdown has begun - Page 30

Originally posted by: Cynical1

...what this movie means by their footfalls and collections are warming Indian hearts the world over with a strong spirit of patriotism and nationalism 🔥

goal achieved

so why this meltdown thread and the term Urduwood???

Originally posted by: Cynical1

https://x.com/Ranveertbt/status/2036076817849700703

Although I fully agree to the praise Ranveer gets, I can't agree to your quite cheap and baseless digs at the Khans (because of your thinking about Muslims).

Others here may applaud it because they may think like you or find this thread funny, but to me, you come across like an surfing instigator trying to ride on a wave of dividing hate... sad.

Originally posted by: Cynical1

...“The movie is not only a commercial success but has deeply impacted the hearts of Indians”

Aman Ki Asha debunked - and urduwoodians stil trying (really hard) to say that Indians would be brothers to India. Ofc. We would be. But Kya karey - Pakistan chose to sponsor terrorism and Aspired to achieve the highest possible rank in the world for it.

So lost in the own hate to make this mistake (underlined)??? N o t Pakistan chose but the military government got well paid (with money and promesses of support, e.g. by USA) to harbour terrorist camps... Was there a referendum that asked the population if they would like to support Western interests by giving Islamic terrorism a place in their country???

And what exactly was the n e e d to even separate the new Pakistan geographically and in two parts... and also give another part of India an insecure status so that it became a 'bone of contention'??? It makes me so angry what a mess (again & again) white coloured people and their way to treat otherwise coloured people did throughout history. In my mind, it's not the colour of the skin that makes a human but the thinking and doing... we a l l have the same emotional pool and same colour of blood, right?

Originally posted by: Cynical1

No one seems to have covered Dhurundhar background score here. But you know what?
I am Charlie Hebdo so I will ❤️

This tweet reminded me of urduwoodians AR Rehmans meltdown after the truth of how much work he has stolen came out. He even tried to play a religion card and failed 🤣.

Please try to enjoy the ground breaking background score of Dhurundhar without another 🔥

ajay dhar ne kahaan kahaan se talent dhoondha hain. Meghalaya . Wah true nationalist Dhar

bold: You may repeat it a thousand times, still it doesn't fit to what you show in IF... I suppose that you don't even read Charlie Hebdo magazines...

bold:So, now, after "the Khans", it's the musician (and Muslim) Rahman (yes, it was unfortunate and stupid what he said in that interview but boy, how much good music he gave to Indian movies!)

bold: I won't contest that Dhar is a "nationalist" but because he took Reble for the movie???? How is that even related? ... Reble got already famous before Dhurandhar, also in the filmindustry... so, with the new trend in action movie's scores, I don't wonder that Dhar took her (and rightly, so).

Originally posted by: Cynical1

yeah movie mein hain kuch na kuch ghar ki kahani har deshbhakt ke leeye. Hence it resonates with every Indian
Movie aisee banao, pura desh jagrut ho jaye aur dushmam khood hi apni pehchan dede. Meltdown ka to guarantee thaa

bold: It gets more & more clear what are your motivations... Dhurandhar becoming a tool this way (through you in this thread)... instead of just something that unites you use it to divide... mega-sad...

Dear, that was meant as an image because of the family metaphor , because he didn't want the partition, he didn't want division... of course I didn't meant it litterally... I already knew what you wrote about India, btw

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

Oh it makes absolute sense for multiple reasons. Just presenting one here.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/new-isi-chief-shares-tenuous-link-with-srk-470972#

Oh, I didn't know that you would fall for such cheap allegations: the deliberate misinterpretation of a Jawan's "ready" to a Dhurandhar's "premiere" (in no way is SRK "jealous" of Ranveer who is close to his heart... well, people just are ignorant when thinking about jealousy when it comes to SRK-Ranveer).

And then taking a distant family-link to prove what, exactly??? What exactly are the "multiple reasons" which make sense to your (wrong) interpretation of SRK's "ready"???

Or are you a believer of dividing non-violent Muslim persons and non-Muslim persons??? Are you a believer of a Muslim Indian not being able to be a patriot per se, especially one that always is pro-India (the country he was born in and he always represents very fine globally - independent of the government's affiliation)???

Does the justified hate for Islamic terrorism cloud the logical and emotional so much that one can't distinguish terrorists and peaceful people???

Haven't still watched the part 2 but I came across this interesting perspective by Rahul Roshan.. For long liberals (or whatever one may want to call them) held this view that it's not the common Pakistanis but the ruling elite that sponsors terrorism. Their people are just like our people.. Doesn't Dhurandhar show the same thing.. ?? These people Major Iqbal, the gangs, the military establishment, government - aren't the the ruling class which is being shown as the sponsors of terrorism and crime within Pakistan and in India.. ?? So why this cry baby attitude ?? Did Aditya Dhar show common Pakistanis burning Indian flags, did he show Pakistanis breaking Hindu temples and idols, did he show Hindu girls being abducted, raped and converted... Did he show their crying parents and courts ordering not to return these girls to their parents ?? No, he did not show all of that.. It happens but he did not show it.. He only showed the ruling class to be bad .. So ideally there shouldn't be any problem...

Originally posted by: Clochette

Dear, that was meant as an image because of the family metaphor , because he didn't want the partition, he didn't want division... of course I didn't meant it litterally... I already knew what you wrote about India, btw

Gandhi wanting something or not is irrelevant. He did as his British masters bid and they wanted this partition for sure.

That man is one of the worst things that has happened to this country.

Originally posted by: Clochette

Oh, I didn't know that you would fall for such cheap allegations: the deliberate misinterpretation of a Jawan's "ready" to a Dhurandhar's "premiere" (in no way is SRK "jealous" of Ranveer who is close to his heart... well, people just are ignorant when thinking about jealousy when it comes to SRK-Ranveer).

And then taking a distant family-link to prove what, exactly??? What exactly are the "multiple reasons" which make sense to your (wrong) interpretation of SRK's "ready"???

Or are you a believer of dividing non-violent Muslim persons and non-Muslim persons??? Are you a believer of a Muslim Indian not being able to be a patriot per se, especially one that always is pro-India (the country he was born in and he always represents very fine globally - independent of the government's affiliation)???

Does the justified hate for Islamic terrorism cloud the logical and emotional so much that one can't distinguish terrorists and peaceful people???

First of all, relax. You’re getting anxious over someone who doesn’t know you.

Yes, I am proudly all those things you asked me about. I don’t believe patriots can divide a country, I live in a country where Muslims have repeatedly carried out attacks and genocides even pre-partition. I have had to see my own family suffer courtesy of Muslims; so I don’t give a damn about them.

I don’t care for labels that you might presume to attach with me because I don’t care about being politically correct when history and facts tell me everything that I need to know.

If you’re uncomfortable with the idea that a person may find Muslims as they’re then well that’s your choice; you can have it but I am free to make mine as well and mine is clearly in the lane opposite yours and shall stay there. If that makes me an Islamophobe or whatever per your analysis, so be it.

https://x.com/warlock_aditya/status/2035594441294282781

A man who can call a vile piece of trash a gentleman; while that thing that masked itself as a human being deserved to be ripped apart piece from piece for attacking innocents in my country doesn’t deserve my respect, adulation or love.

The other reasons - he’s a man whose stardom is practically over. He has always been a very limited actor in terms of range but what helped him was youth, connections and the hype created by his PR. He has some talent but he’s not by any stretch of the imagination a versatile actor.

His youth has faded, his connections can keep work coming but he has been exposed as a corporate fraud. He’s trying and failing spectacularly in his attempts to redefine and reinvent himself. He can’t pull off action roles, he can’t do period dramas and romance as a genre is no longer selling.

He’s seen that over the last few years the movies that have done spectacularly include Bahubali, RRR and now Dhurandhar, along with small budget movies that went onto become massive hits like Kantara. He’s not fit for any of those movies or similar. His future projects will never get the kind of organic success these projects got because they celebrated India and what we are as a country, people, culture in its various forms.

His era is gone. That’s a fact.