Global Alert: US–Israel's Major Military Operations against Iran🔥#2 - Page 78

https://assamtribune.com/international/rights-body-500-minority-girls-abducted-forcibly-converted-in-pakistan-1609598

Viswaruti, I didn't read any of the other contributions yet, but the reciproce threatening has become another tool through social media... diplomatic work has become a joke facing social media campaigns... and the people behind are happy about that... they don't care for India or Pakistan or any other country, they only care for their own interests... which is more power, more money, more influence. I'm sure, they even started to send people into social media areas to manipulate people's opinions in their own interest (or that of a government craving from diversion of own failures).

Originally posted by: NathuPaapi

What am I reading - mocking of Gods is worse than terrorism

I only quote the most relevant and I think you don't understand what it means to mock Gods, a God...

There was a reason why I posted Aishwarya's take in front of a Modi taken aback by her statements... but she is right - and I explained it in another post... God (whoever, in whichever appearance) is omnipresent and not bound to a n y religion made by humans but there for the genuine love they have for their own species and God's force (in whatever avatar).

Yes , God is superior to us humans with the limited use we make of our cerebral potential... terrorism is an invention of humans to instill fear, to bring death, to do criminal deeds for selfish gains... humanity will get lost without turning towards a force that embodies love and evolution, respect for life and compassion...

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

And there is no necessity that there needs to be a omnipresent God, there could be infinite Gods each filling every part of universe.

The God is omnipresent is just a belief that doesn't need to be true.

If there is zero God then in mind the force that exists can not be concluded to be God.. It's like saying TV off is a channel because we still still see the black screen

If God is an emotion then it definitely can't be one.. it will be at least equal to the number of concious minds who think of God because each of them have a different emotion

God can be one, but it will be perceived differently by different people with the different emotions.

Originally posted by: Srijeeta06

God can be one, but it will be perceived differently by different people with the different emotions.

can be one but not necessarily one

Originally posted by: InsaneDivine

What about the things you don't love ? If God is omnipresent wouldn't he/she/it be there in things you don't love as well ? Also unless you have known through experience A-Z about the entire cosmos, it is unfair to claim that God is only an emotion. He could very much be physically present.. Also many Gods could be there, many forces can be there.. It necessarily need not be one...

Indeed, there are many forces (imo) but there indeed could be a supreme force... I think that the people we have genuinely loved in our life and who have physically died are still there to support our endeavours done in a good spirit...but there are - of course - all the forces that want to influence us to act against what we - inherently - know as good... they have to be there to make us choose... choice is the "crux" of the way we became the (current) 'peak of evolution'. Btw, God as such hasn't a gender... but he can be present in every gender... even in a new-born child whose eyes still can project the wisdom and knowledge of the previous space the soul had been in (it will loose this knowledge to get a new start, the knowledge burried deep down - to get used later or not... a choice to make).

Originally posted by: Srijeeta06

God can be one, but it will be perceived differently by different people with the different emotions.

Yes.

Because no two people are same.

But this also doesn’t imply that there are multiple Gods or vice-versa.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

And there is no necessity that there needs to be a omnipresent God, there could be infinite Gods each filling every part of universe. ...

Only quoting this part although I like your post as a whole

I think that the creative force is a 'one'-force and to me, God is a creative force (even though the names may differ)... but I also believe that the concept of Karma is something very valuable as nothing gets lost and will get used for a change at an unknown time. It had been only o n e force that created the universe setting free a multitude of other forces as consequence... If one looks at all the microcosmos we encounter on earth (including us), we ge the repetition of the macrocosmos (including the dark holes) and its forces... there is only one force that tops all the others... it is the feeling of love (the unconditional one)... and - imo - it's the most valuable gift we got from God... it's not only a love aimed to our fellow humans but also to what we do, what we cherish... but it had to be unconditional... conditions will teint this blessing of experiencing the love of all the good forces of the Universe.

Gosh, I just realise the thread... we completely are on another level... sorry...

However... eventually... every war humankind fought, had been to show us how futile those wars are...actually...

Edit: to add, I like the way Hinduism has created gods with different tasks... it suits very much my childlike nature...and it is very endearing because they are so close to us humans

Originally posted by: Cynical1

if only the world ran on her opinion ...

Ha ha, the first line caught me and I didn't read the rest...

Yes, I think, it would be a world using the potential human beings got in a more positive way, not manipulating, however showing love, compassion and endeavour to understand and accept differences (because of different life conditions), would support every endeavour to make earth a more secure place for the kids... would strive to value honesty in everything that has to deal with history, present discourses and the faults 'in our machine'... r e a l l y would try to make poeple accept and act according to the human rights... would o n l y consider what people do/how they act regardless of a n y religion, social stand etc but always listen to the reasons they tell... I would have an open mind, no prejudices but a firm stand against violence (physical and emotional one)... I would listen, digging deep and never ever fake my love for humanity as flawed as it may be.

So, dear Cynical1, now you know why I'm not one of your followers... you're utterly fake (in my feeling, though... which could get easily changed when getting to know why you act in the forum the way you does ).

Edit: Gosh, responding on all my notifications, I just didn't realise the threads...

Originally posted by: xnbstar

@bold 💯💯💯 I remember during my college days when the same incident happened in my city and I was against this but others were keep targeting me. Still my stance was same that it’s never allowed to take justice on our hands. Tolerance and forgiveness should be incorporated instead and keep the rest of the matter to our Lord. Howevers, those people need to understand too that making fun of others is equally unacceptable too.

See, my aim was to say that mocking is not acceptable since it could hurt the sentiments of those who firmly belief in our Creator. But it never meant that Terrorism can get a clear chit. Nobody in their right mind would want to see bloodshed. Humans are designed to feel pain and empathy.

Despite having contrasting differences, we are humans first. We need to explore ways to diminish the negative perception of each other. I understand opinions vary largely, but to some extent, at last, we all are rooting for a wonderful planet Earth, aren't we?

And lastly, no body is my friend here. I just joined this discussion when one user told me on the world cup thread regarding this. Well, I am not silencing you at all. I am reading and replying. Thanks for understanding.

I don’t assign labels so I am going to state this again. I don’t know if you know or don’t know - so not going to assume. The words you used (as others have also pointed out ) are used as follows “insult our prophet and STSJ”. And unfortunately so many have executed on those words. That is what your words too implied.

It would be good to clarify instead of going in circles what you meant and if you didn’t. It’s normal for us peacefuls that have seen so much hate and those phrases to assume the same. So why not clarify for all of us ?

And rest you can see the targeted attack to silence me. She can keep trying. While I have restricted my posts to Islamic extremism/terrorism they have insulted all of us with Hindutva etc. But not going to drag you into that. The above clarification is helpful.

Same for your old siggy , not once have you acknowledged that what it meant was extremely wrong. Take this reply in the spirit it’s intended. Even if you don’t reply, I am not going to go there.

According to me ,people who have had the privilege of an education like CS and live in the west like you owe it to contribute to society and religion towards a path of moderate thinkin. CS in addition also gives one an ability to have critical and logical thinking. This does not mean one looses one’s faith but modernizing never results in that. I am a moderate myself. And strive to challenge myself to ensure I remain in the middle.

It’s only the extremists supporters that try to silence us and that too repeatedly.

When I say I am Charlie Hebdo that goes both ways for the other person I am conversing with as well.