Global Alert: US–Israel's Major Military Operations on Iran🔥#2 - Page 44

That was what I wrote...

Originally posted by: Clochette

It may not be the "third world country" label but the fact that Afghanistan is ruled by a terror organisation (Taliban) who blatantly disrespects human rights citing a religion as justification.

Pakistan and Afghanistan and their 'skirmishes' (even though now involving civilian people) certainly are on the backburner relative to the global stage... however, interesting how the Indian government reacted obviously accepting the Taliban (= Muslim) extremism (like they seem to negotiate with Iran which also is ruled by Islamic extremism...)... Could somebody explain me the difference about the regimes in Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan relative to their crimes against humanity done by Islamic extremism??? It seems that the Indian government sees a difference...

That is your reaction targeted at me...

Originally posted by: Cynical1

wow. Humanity surfaces only when islamic extremists are killed depending on who did the killing

Not an ounce of sympathy for boming of Afhanistan hospital by Pakistan. Just a littany of excuses and no condemnation.

Just quote yourself on all these human rights violations when Pakistan pays for its karma as that will be truejustice. Yes i will be cheering it on in case you have not guessed it.

What has Pakistan been rulers upto ? Constant genocide and terrorism support. They even jailed Imran khan (serves him right i suppose in some peoples eyes that support Pakistan no matter what)

Why don’t you explain when you support Islamic extremism in the name of humanity or govt when you feel its ok to call out other world leaders acting against it ?

That is harrassement what you do... I try to ignore your constant rants and wanting to force me to respond to your posts but with the bold part and your false accusations aimed at me, it really is enough! You could have - instead - give your thoughts about the question I posted at the end (see my quote above)... but n o! - reported for harrassement

Your reply on p 37 focusses on the Indian government, not on my question... Did I b l a m e the Indian government??? No, but you seem to have assumed it only because I wrote this line. Obviously, the Indian government sees a difference, so it's their prerogative, right? No discussion about t h a t.

I wanted a personal view relative to my question. Or no view at all

Originally posted by: Cynical1

I ignored the labels she gave me as they don’t bother me and have been predicted decades ago by some who saw this coming

I was just thinking. She actually went on some crazy rant about Hindutva. Which was total falsities. Then pointed and said stick to topic to others. I think she cannot accept Islamic extremism exists and “largely peaceful majority” isn’t peaceful either so she tries to attack members and other religions.

All of a sudden Afghanistan is run by taliban and terrorists because the terrorist Pakistani govt bombed a hospital there but they can’t be condemned.

Absolutely hypocritical and clearly on the side of Islamic extremists. And yet they claim Islamic terrorism does not have a religion as if we are 5 year olds that do not understand their reality.

Even attributed mass killings of minorities in Pakistan to mass migration. These aren’t blinders. These are deliberate words to support activities of Islamic extremism’s on SM platforms with smoke and mirrors

Another vile attack on me - with again the same lie (bold red) because it wasn't a rant but the definition of the word AI/google gives! Gosh, you can't get over me... or what? - reported for continued, fact distorting, personally targeted harrassement again

Originally posted by: KingGodzilla

The verses came from Uthmānī/Madinah (Cairo 1924) Qur’ān. The one ali khamenei followed for his Islamic rule of iran. So saying it has nothing to do with the topic is false. Taqiyya won’t work anymore.

Khamenei was a dictator and it doesn’t matter what he followed or what he didn’t.

Hitler was also a dictator who followed Bible and then he ordered mass genocides of Jews, which is considered to be one of the worst in the human history.

Let’s not bring verses of any religious scripture here and attack each other.

Religion is one’s personal belief, be it Gita, Bible, Quran or Granth Sahib.

War in Iran started because US wanted to take over oil reserves.

So let’s just stick to that and the impact it will bring as a whole on global economy.

Originally posted by: Cynical1

Clochette - Any thoughts on why they Islamic extremists and the “largely peaceful majority” continue to need aid, assistance and asylum all over the world more than any other community globally ?

You don't care a fig about my thoughts ... you're just trying to harass me

Originally posted by: IamRaj96

I kind of agree with all your points but i do believe that a vassal state iran would be very different from a vassal state pakistan. Imo iranian people are more educated, progressive and come from a rich historical background. Because of that, i believe a vassal state iran would focus more on development and progress.

On the other hand, india is one of the fastest growing economies in the world, so a vassal state iran would have no choice but to engage with india in trade and possibly build strategic alliances (since they will lose our on china they had to build strong ties with india for rapid development), so i dont think there would be a major impact on india - iran relations, whether iran becomes a vassal state or remains under its current regime. However, a weakened iran under its current regime would be more advantageous for india than a stronger iran under the same regime.

Also, for a vassal state iran, the USA’s priorities would be different compared to pakistan. Iran would likely be used to weaken china by taking away one of its key strategic partners and to gain greater control over middle eastern oil reserves and trade routes. Pakistan, on the other hand is used for different strategic purposes.

The USA uses different vassal states for different goals, pakistan is used in the context of india, Iran would be used against china and for control over middle eastern energy and trade routes, south korea and japan are used to keep north korea and china in check, EU is aligned against russia and taiwan plays a role in countering china and securing semiconductors. So, in the case of a vassal state Iran, the primary focus would not really be india.

@bold india is going to be market that foreign investors cant ignore if they want to grow in decade or two. Other countries will also have to look at india as an important trading partner. I completely agree with the lady in the clip, whether she is talking about india, china, south korea, taiwan or brazil.

https://x.com/i/status/2035044365513773306

Thats why i believe that even new vassal state like iran (if USA wins the war) would have to maintain good relations with india if it wants to develop and grow.

Ups... are this the illegal immigrants who want to spend abraod the dollars Trump gave them??? (well, no, I guess)

https://x.com/mattvanswol/status/2034980582824849587

Originally posted by: Cynical1

... As the British system develops cracks supporting the asylees that come and depend on social support , don’t work and pray on streets, the prince has finally spoken about the madness going on there

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxFad6P4avE

Originally posted by: Cynical1

The “largely peaceful majority” keeps busy not being peaceful. Doesn’t it ?

Would you read it - to educate yourself?

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/08/09/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/

Although 10 years old... an excerpt