Global Alert: US–Israel's Major Military Operations on Iran🔥#2 - Page 25

Originally posted by: Cynical1

You said mocking gods is worse than terrorism and I didn’t even mock gods.

My words have always been directed at Islamic terrorists and its supporters.

You all decided that ummah matters more and called me anti Muslim which I am not.

I have openly stated Pakistans turn will come due to its karma which is a fact Google the number of minorities from 1947 and now look at what it did in Kashmir , acts of terrorism across the world and recent act against hospital in Afghanistan. This is forums of India . Operation Sindoor was conducted by govt of India for Pakistans role in terrorism

they know i am a messenger of peace standing firmly against terrorism and extremism.

Freedom of speech allows us to be against Islamic extremism and also against Pakistan which not only sponsors terror but check the video by DNI on Pakistan. I have posted it.

You won’t silence me no matter what attempts you make. Charlie Hebdo lives in all of us for his firm belief in freedom of speech.

1. I got an email notification where you mentioned "He".

2. No one is supporting any terrorists here, first of all. I have seen other comments indicating everyone wants happiness and prosperity in this world.

3. I never explicitly mentioned like you have written here. Maybe you're getting wrong here.

4. If a country has evil practices, then certainly a severe punishment will come, as no one supports innocent people losing. As we are humans first, again emphasizing, no one from any religion supports this.

If some using altered religious narratives to support these illegal activities then surely, a time will come with the relevant punishment for hurting innocent human beings.

5. Please don’t misinterpret my comments and assume on your own. I don’t support any violence or illegal activities as I’m against all forms of extremism related to anything.

Yes, freedom of speech is necessary but it doesn't mean we started perceiving things as per own assumptions.

However, I am witnessing that you're continuously misinterpreting my words, adding narratives of your own. Again, nobody supports terrorism, terrorists, and extremism here, including me, be it from any caste or religion. In this way, we are all putting negativity in our brains, and sometimes, a message caused by anger doesn't mean that is the actual intent of the writer. Peace and unity are the two significant things we all yearn for. Humans need love not hatred! ✨️

This discussion is getting misinterpreted, so I don’t want continue further now. Stay happy and blessed! 👍

Originally posted by: Cynical1

https://x.com/aravind/status/2034521501391610076

When there was a reduction in crude oil prices all over the world, India didn’t do it.

So now it’s getting balanced out when it is increasing in most of the countries in the world.

https://x.com/i/status/2013635623740195224

This is still not the tweet i was talking about but it does make a point.

Originally posted by: Cynical1

I can’t explain anymore as I am tired of this loop.

Freedom of speech can never be worse than terrorism. Nothing can be worse than terrorism.

Agreed nothing can be worse than terrorism.

But citing ‘mocking’ as freedom of speech is also not a justifiable.

Originally posted by: NathuPaapi

Exactly. You will hear he or she follows Hinduism Sikhism Buddhism...But you will never hear someone say he or she is following christianism or Islamism. They always say he or she follows Christianity or Islam. Have u ever wondered why?

Not until you pointed this out.

But why?

Originally posted by: Srijeeta06

Not until you pointed this out.

But why?

https://x.com/i/status/2013635623740195224

Originally posted by: Clochette

I rest my case with the following overview relative to the question: Which kind of Muslims are the most offensive ones?

"Identifying a single "kind" of Muslim as the most offensive is not possible based on objective analysis, as Muslims are a diverse group of over 1.8 billion people with widely varying interpretations of their faith and personal actions.

However, perspectives on what makes certain actions or groups within or relating to Islam "offensive" or problematic differ:

• Extremist Groups: Groups such as ISIS or other "Islamists" are widely criticized by both non-Muslims and many Muslims for interpreting and acting upon Islamic teachings in ways that involve violence, which critics describe as a distortion of the faith.
• Literalist/Ideological Interpretations: Some interpretations of Islamic texts, particularly those that ignore historical context or promote strict "abrogation" (later violent verses canceling earlier peaceful ones), are seen as problematic and, for some, offensive.
• Internal Islamic Criticism: Islamic scholars and many believers often find actions like Gheeba (backbiting), Buhtan (slander), and Namima (malicious gossip) to be deeply problematic behavior from fellow Muslims.
• Generalizing Muslims: It is worth noting that while some may find specific interpretations of Islam offensive, treating Muslims as a collective group, associating all with violence, or stereotyping them is a significant form of anti-Muslim hostility, which is itself considered offensive and prejudicial, particularly when it leads to discrimination or hate crimes.

Ultimately, the term "offensive" is subjective, and what one group finds offensive, another may not. The diversity within Islam means there is no monolithic "kind" of Muslim." (AI) "monolithic" has a slightly negative connotation...e.g. a monolithic society is rigid and homogenous, not open to new ideas (as actual example North Korea is cited).

Nice analysis! Hopefully, the person who is helping agencies to eliminate extremists can understand the context better.

When you label 'extremists' with Islam and think that no one will point it out then it is vague.

99% of the current arguments could've been avoided if only extremists should be mentioned intially instead of the 'Islamic' extremists. Hopefully, this harassment against Islam needs to be reported to those agencies as well.

People are very well aware and can use those statements to further strengthen their case. Muslims are not here to be abused and mocked!

Originally posted by: Clochette

To get a balance, just an overview about the difference between Hinduism and Hindutva (latter the admitted concept of the currently ruling parties):

"what is the difference between Hinduism and Hindutva?"

"Hinduism is an ancient, diverse religion and philosophy focused on spiritual paths, while Hindutva is a modern, 20th-century political ideology focused on creating an ethno-religious "Hindu Nation" (Hindu Rashtra) in India

Hinduism is religious and pluralistic, whereas Hindutva is political and aims to unify Hindu identity as a cultural and national identity.

Key differences between the two include:

• Definition & Nature: Hinduism is a set of spiritual beliefs, traditions, and practices, often termed "Sanatana Dharma". Hindutva, often translated as "Hinduness," is a right-wing political ideology first defined by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar to define Indian cultural identity.
• Focus: Hinduism focuses on individual spirituality, karma, and salvation. Hindutva focuses on political mobilization, nationalistic pride, and the state-level assertion of Hindu culture.
• Inclusivity vs. Homogenization: Hinduism is highly decentralized and accommodates many diverse practices and interpretations. Hindutva seeks to create a standardized or homogenized Hindu identity.
• Origin: Hinduism is often regarded as having ancient origins. Hindutva is a modern concept, codified in the early 1920s.
• Relationship to Others: Hinduism has historically been inclusive and pluralistic. Hindutva is often defined in contrast to what it considers "threatening others," often targeting minority groups and advocating for a nation-state based on a single culture.

In essence, Hinduism is the faith system, while Hindutva is a political project that uses that faith system for building a national identity.

From my side, no discussions anymore about Muslim-Hindu... Both, Trump and Netanyahu have other things in mind than religions...

https://x.com/i/status/2011010321260167401

Imho, there is no "God-made" belief system, only men-made systems that propagate belief in one God, in no God or in many Gods.

Originally posted by: NathuPaapi

https://x.com/i/status/2013635623740195224

Hinduism was coined first by Raja RamMohan Roy.

And Hindutva by Chandrababu Basu in a book he published, about the life and aspects of a person following Hinduism.