It is not blind trust neither it is Mannats responsibility to check or investigate.
Its is Vikrants responsibility as an organizer to get to the bottom of things. Which he did only AFTER Mannat vouched that Bunty doesnt lie and there might be some truth to what he is saying.
Yet Vik still doubted Bunty might be saying this from a grudge. Why cant he extend the same doubt towards Yuvi??? Since he also knows Yuvi hates Dua????
Like Shiro pointed out... it has to do with Mannat knowing Yuvis behaviour aprior. If Vik can believe Yuvi didnt do wrong so can Mannat believe Bunty.
This is the second blast at the event which Mannat doesnt know but other parents and Vik knows. Shouldn't he wonder over it????
And reiterating again... Mannat has not blamed Yuvi. She simply defended a child who is currently dependent on her and with a previous experience of how nasty Yuvi could be. A truth Vik knows too. Which BTW vamps don't know either.
I get what you are saying about ManViks trust issues... but this is not that case. We dont have to defend Vik and bring out Mannats faults just for the sake of it.




1.4k