Originally posted by: Kidult104
As much as I remember, Gagan was neither thrown out of house nor he was made to feel poor. Mannat never acted as some audacious person or anything. The latest ManVik confrontation didnt sit well with many people because agree or not, Vikrant did come across as a prideful person. I can definitely understand his hurt and he found a way to let it out, but I would have understood if he would've said stuff about Mannat leaving him for his brother or anything. Going on her financial crisis, stopping the business deal in between when he was just the middle man, calling her thagne wali, shameless, gold digger, opportunist what not where each of these tags fits him well. Why doesnt he have an anwer when someone shows him a mirror about his snatching the property and sitting on it? If Mannat would've been gold digger or opportunist, why would she have given up her shares immediately along with ronnie?
My concern is, Vikrant is definitely looking like a rich brat and I dont want that tag on him for long. It will make his redemption shallow. I would've loved if he would've taken only his shares, but he didnt. 7 years and he still doesnt have much of regrets of living off on that money. Thats worrisome. He has a child now who is grown up in a grounded environment. Will he have answers to her that why he lives in richness while her mom and his parents are living in simplicity?
I want the bankruptcy track for Vikrant himself. Except vamps, majority of positive character have gone through that middle class or less money phase except Vikrant, which is why many a times those characters come across more practical than Vikrant. He has genuinely gone of the track and this tainted wealth is definitely one of the reasons. He needs to be cleaned off that richie rich tag for sometime.
Bold: That's what I am saying it's plot loop hole, just like mannat not returning ars property to gagan.. even if gagan was not asked to leave, isn't it mannat's responsibility to give back the property to rightful owner, gagan was seen saying so many times that he doesn't have money, mannat didn't think of giving back his rights at those times??, it's not her charecter graph right??even I know it, mannat would have definitely returned back the property, but it's just plot loop hole that she didn't . . just like that vik would have definitely returned back the property to rotu and felt guilty about the money but they are not addressing this because of poor plot/writing
And I have said vik went overboard with mannat the other day.. but it's not pride, it was bitterness and wanting to trigger her so that she will show her feelings regarding him...it is absolutely wrong no matter the emotions behind it ....but it's not pride....If it was pride or wanting to put her down, he wouldn't have asked to keep an eye on her after she literally blasted him off.. mannat rightfully insulted vik, but any egostic, prideful person who looks down on other person would have not cared about why the person needs money after getting insulted by mannat in most humiliating way.. but vik immediately asked his PA to check out for mannat...
Just like @ Moor mentioned ,Basically vik wants mannat's reaction and attention, he is purposely triggering her to push her to express her feelings regarding their past, he is not liking mannat's indifferent attitude... so ya it's not vik's pride or brattish attitude, or him wanting to look down on mannat Or her financial status but its his bitterness,anger.. Nevertheless he is wrong and needs to change his approach..
Edited by ChaoticTangles - a day ago
1.5k