I agree with what you’ve said, but at the same time these portal narratives are usually driven by the makers themselves to test the waters. Whether negative or positive the intent is to create hype around the show. As Moor rightly pointed out, he mentioned that things will eventually get resolved but given the current track, that it feels like an eternity especially when the story has barely moved beyond the characters just crossing paths. The core issue lies with the writers and the execution team and that is precisely why Ayesha and Mannat are facing backlash. Viewers tend to connect with a character’s core and perspective. From the audience’s POV, she is a single woman living with her brother in law, who himself acknowledged her as a sister in the pre leap episodes. Now, showing him developing feelings for her based on time spent together under changed circumstances is not being received well. The confusion arises when actors give IV stating that the character is a strong single mother only for the narrative to later shift towards co-parenting with another man. The outrage is not about future plot possibilities but about what is being shown currently especially when the writers reuse the same dialogues that were once used for Manvik. Sadly, audiences often overlook men’s actions and instead direct their frustration towards the woman. What viewers expected was a pure, untainted friendship with no emotional milawat. However, the flipped dialogues and DK’s partial acceptance of his feelings give the audience an impression of intent, especially when viewed in light of pre-leap incidents. Even if he hadn’t fallen for her earlier he clearly has now, while the girl remains completely unaware of his feelings and continues to give him lifetime assurances without knowing the full truth and here DK also uaware of Vik’s truth, but it feels like the team is deliberately cashing in on negative hype similar to what they did during the Malla-Vik angle. Perhaps this is also why the Y character was introduced, after audiences reacted against the two sisters and one man dynamic, calling it a bad social example. To course-correct, the makers added a new female character in Vik’s life. In our society, such relationships still face limited acceptance, and that is why the backlash is spilling across all platforms.
During my discussion with Rd yesterday, I mentioned and anticipated the potential trolling and backlash FL would receive , specifically in view of her lifetime assurances and his accepted feelings for her.


.
and gets more praises & promises from Mannat. What was this scene even meant to convey, DK is Cunning and Mannat is stupid?
This is mera jaanbujhke wala...so tagging only those who share same to same thoughts
1.5k