Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2: EDT # 6- Page 69

Originally posted by: adeela

so what? But what respect Tanya is there that she is living with a man who doesn't want her ? Tanya was still hanging on to him despite knowing that karan loves nandini only and despite her telling him she will leave after nandini comes. Also why she took whole property of karan of alimony to divorce him ? Tanya didn't tell the truth about nandini to bhoomi and manthan. She cried infront of manthan and bhoomi she blames nandini for ruining her life but later both manthan and bhoomi admitted tanya poisoned their mind against nandini . Even daimini told tanya that karan stuck in nandini's memories, which is why karan has denied tanya her marital rights.

By what rights she lived there - the rights given by Ekta and her writers. They wanted her in SN back then, so she was there. They’ve not asked her to come back again, so she’s not here so far in this season.

Arguing with me doesn’t change this is S1 canon. I am not suggesting any of this happen now but simply stating this did.

If you must argue, go argue with Ekta, her team and the channel who have changed canon facts and made Parth Tanya’s son biologically this season, when we know he was Nandini’s.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

@bold no Kesar had 3 other daughters that she raised herself Sharmili Lajja and Aparna.

Ohh.. okay but do writers of kyunki knows that?

I mean Harsh and these 3 daughters means kesar had 4 children by herself in kyunki 1 only so what's point of showing another More 3 children of kesar? Total 7😳 Thats why I think writes didn't remember themselves that Kesar had 4 children in kyunki 1 only?

Better they would shown us that all 3 Paridhi, Ritik and angad are adopted from orphanage.

Originally posted by: Prapti9

Ohh.. okay but do writers of kyunki knows that?

I mean Harsh and these 3 daughters means kesar had 4 children by herself in kyunki 1 only so what's point of showing another More 3 children of kesar? Total 7😳 Thats why I think writes didn't remember themselves that Kesar had 4 children in kyunki 1 only?

Better they would shown us that all 3 Paridhi, Ritik and angad are adopted from orphanage.

They could have been grand children of Mihir Tulsi. Or else children of some other cousin of Mihir/Tulsi

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

Rent in Mumbai is extremely high. You’re also supposed to pay deposit with rent when you start renting, which essentially is extra money. Say your rent is 25K per month, and this is for matchbox sized flats in Mumbai, in ordinary neighbourhoods not even posh areas, the deposit will be 1 lakh. You pay that deposit and per contract at least 2 months of rent in advance. The deposit is returned when you vacate the premises, IF you have done your paperwork properly. If you have damaged the property then the landlord deducts the money from your deposit, if you did nothing they refund the whole amount.

The broker is also supposed to be paid at least 15K or so, depending on his charges which is determined by his experience.

So even prior to moving into a new place which is rented Angad needs at least 1.5 - 2 lakhs in hand to start looking for these properties. And he still has to meet his regular expenses.

His share of rent of the room chawl if not the entire rent of the chawl, daily expenses like groceries, clothes, shoes etc. He had twins so double the expenses of every single thing that a newborn needs (and they need a LOT of things), Vrinda’s medical expenses at that time, school fees once the kids were old enough. Then a family this huge would have medical expenses from time to time too right from regular cough, cold and fevers to other illnesses. There is a senior citizen in that family and 2 children so those are a given. And I still haven’t accounted for their light bill and mobile bill, travel expenses even if they use passes for rail and bus transport.

All of it based on whatever salary he has or whatever he makes from his business.

It might seem unrealistic but in a way this is the most real thing in the show. Life in Mumbai is as it is expensive, account for all those things and you won’t think it is insane that he didn’t manage to get a decent place so far despite 6 years. Some people never get to buy their own home here despite living here all their lives. Some do but it’s a small one room house that is as tiny as you can imagine.

Honestly its so weird that everyone's lives changed and Parth looks and dresses the same

even that hemant ki biwi looks same as if she came 6 days ago and not 6 years ago.

They could have shown a slight change for hemant ki biwi and parth

Shantiniketan has soo much kai kai kau kau kach kach

its just a posh chawl in name of kalesh

jo chawl mein kalesh and kai kai hota hai

it same happens in SN

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Why does he have to stay in Mumbai?

Try for a job in other cities. And many companies (in fact all decent ones) give reallocation allowances

You’re talking sense. We are watching a show, meant for a device termed as the “idiot box”.

In real world, Angad would have inherited something from Anupam, had contacts, friends, help from his brothers and sister even if not openly until Mihir’s affair was exposed. IRL, Angad would have never had to live in a chawl even though Mihir kicked him out of SN because Anupam owned a bungalow too! Even if that place had to be dismantled or whatever, Anupam was shown as a very rich man himself - stands to reason he owned multiple properties, not just in Mumbai but around India and perhaps even abroad. Angad would have rightfully inherited at least a third of those. Even if he didn’t inherit a property in Mumbai, he would have inherited something somewhere! But they would rather go down this route for drama and owing to Ekta’s obsession with that chawl set. She wants her money’s worth from it and will use it until it collapses even if including it doesn’t make sense!

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

By what rights she lived there - the rights given by Ekta and her writers. They wanted her in SN back then, so she was there. They’ve not asked her to come back again, so she’s not here so far in this season.

Arguing with me doesn’t change this is S1 canon. I am not suggesting any of this happen now but simply stating this did.

If you must argue, go argue with Ekta, her team and the channel who have changed canon facts and made Parth Tanya’s son biologically this season, when we know he was Nandini’s.

Its chaotic

Tanya,nandini,damini etc etc

I cannot comprehend that in 38 years of marriage of tuhir

Karan had his chaotic love life

Originally posted by: Prapti9

Ohh i didn't know that. Thx what i knew that Viranis aware that Harsh is Kesar's child. Actually i didn't watch kyunki gen 1 and 2 every epi..onlysome and understood story mostly

Thx for correcting

But i still think my knowledge of kyunki 1 is far better than kyunki 2 writers

You’re welcome

Originally posted by: Prapti9

Ohh.. okay but do writers of kyunki knows that?

I mean Harsh and these 3 daughters means kesar had 4 children by herself in kyunki 1 only so what's point of showing another More 3 children of kesar? Total 7😳 Thats why I think writes didn't remember themselves that Kesar had 4 children in kyunki 1 only?

Better they would shown us that all 3 Paridhi, Ritik and angad are adopted from orphanage.

They have not mentioned Harsh and the 3 daughters this season.

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

They have not mentioned Harsh and the 3 daughters this season.

Thats why i would like to count it kyunki in parallel universe where marrige at 16 year allowed as Tuhir 38 year and their grand children age didn't makes any sense

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

You’re talking sense. We are watching a show, meant for a device termed as the “idiot box”.

In real world, Angad would have inherited something from Anupam, had contacts, friends, help from his brothers and sister even if not openly until Mihir’s affair was exposed. IRL, Angad would have never had to live in a chawl even though Mihir kicked him out of SN because Anupam owned a bungalow too! Even if that place had to be dismantled or whatever, Anupam was shown as a very rich man himself - stands to reason he owned multiple properties, not just in Mumbai but around India and perhaps even abroad. Angad would have rightfully inherited at least a third of those. Even if he didn’t inherit a property in Mumbai, he would have inherited something somewhere! But they would rather go down this route for drama and owing to Ekta’s obsession with that chawl set. She wants her money’s worth from it and will use it until it collapses even if including it doesn’t make sense!

Anupam had 6 children so I think he didn't have enough for the children to inherit

And if we go that way, then why did Tuhir need to adopt these three GenZ children, they had 3 elder sisters (and even Harsh as a half brother and Karan as first cousin) in any normal case these people would have had the first right of adoption that a second cousin of mom.

But I am sure that makers forgot how many people Anupam Kesar family had