Originally posted by: Rdigest
I don't have a problem for her not telling him yet since he will ask for proof which she never had. And after confession if she told him, he might have believed her but again what is the proof.
My issue was with her thoughts, how was she thinking about Malla but not the guilt & shame Vikrant was going through. ❌
Both her and her Vikrant are naive 
Mannat’s thoughts …. I’m not sure she’s thought about it thoroughly enough , she certainly doesn’t know the full context (i.e Vik thought he was with Mannat) and the details (I.e M undressed him fully), both were without Vik’s consent/knowledge.
does Mannat consider it a crime? That deserves punishment?
Does Mannat know how guilty Vik feels?
If yes to both above, she should now tell him.
I think now Malla has refused to sign, the Divorce isn’t straight forward, so Mannat may well tell him so they try to get a confession out of Malla. I had really wanted the exposé without Mannat being involved.
1.5k