Originally posted by: Moor278
You didnt read properly then.... I did say he taking the blame for everything Malla turned into is not required. She is equal party for the mess if not more (since he doesnt know everything)
She is not innocent .. has done multiple crimes. He calls her a criminal... there shouldn't be any guilt on his part...
Insecurity does not mean you would poison innocent children who have nothing to do with this...
Moreover her consent in the ONS is not even addressed... he was not in his senses... she was... what she did is an assault.... she knew he was imagining Mannat... Still went ahead... and Vikrant has not considered this at all..... thats stupid and there's no other word for it...
Mannat ko to actual situation nahi pata.... he knows exactly what happened... for him to ignore everything she said that morning and taking all the blame is not all goodness...
ok, first of all, Vikrant can never forgive her and wont forgive her for her crimes. Second, he already said that malla is selfish and is blaming him and is marriage for the selfish act (while conversing with mannu about divorce) its his decision to divorce her seeing her vile nature.
Now, its his innate goodness , that he is talking politely to her and also considers himself a part of the crime, because he still thinks that maybe if he hadnt married, all this wouldnt have happened. He is still unaware of the crimes that she did.
so whats the issue with it?
And he doesnt remember a thing about ONS, he even told her that he doesnt remember doing such a thing.
Mannat doesnt even come into play here but yes she should atleast tell him that that night nothing happened if she always stands for truth.
Vikrant is not stupid. He is just too good for this vile world.
1.4k