YRKKH BTS, SM updates & Spoilers Thread #119 - Page 73

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

isn't it same for akshara she gave promise to neil to take care of ruhi when he was dying and then when arohi was dying again arohi asked her to take care of her child but what ak did she just ran away because her divorce was greater than promise given to the person who died while saving her. Her dumb sacrifice which made her to leave udaipur was greater than taking care of ruhi after arohi's death.

When ak did that only few people called her out and rest all blaming 6 year old for the accident and rest all are painting ak as some move on devi.

So why not armaan. He can also move on by leaving all promises to protect his child like his teacher did. Ab why he should listen moral lecture ?

Both ak and ar are dumb characters. Atleast ar is ML who is prone to make mistakes to glorify fl as per itv norms. But toh made sure ppl think that's correct thing to do. 💁‍♀️

Ps : i am neither abhira supporter nor armaan supporter. But for me wrong is wrong and yes you are right armaan was wrong so do AK was wrong in last gen. I don't justify their behaviour by giving excuse.

His daughter was kidnapped by the nurse he himself appointed going against everyone's wish. From whom was he securing his daughter??? No one is devta and devi in this show, hence every character will be called out. Why would people be mocked for attending moral science lectures only when they criticize either Armaan or Abhimanyu????

Moral science was brought in only for criticising the members of the forum. It was never mentioned for criticising characters.

If some have the right to call Armaan or Ruhi or whoever else whatever they feel like, then others have the right to defend or love or hate whoever they want to.

But if another member starts to wonder or question how some other member likes a certain character, its definitely not cool and is surely MORAL POLICING!!!

So maybe it would be better if we start getting the facts right before saying whatever!!

No one here has said Armaan is right!! But liking Armaan for whatever other reasons is our prerogative just as much liking other characters is yours.

So it would be better if everyone keeps the discussion to the characters and stops wondering how other people can like or dislike characters!!

Originally posted by: nivedha_123

If I remember correctly, everyone was calling out the makers (even shippers) when her character was shown in poor light during surrogacy track. They were asking the right questions ki how can they show a woman, greiving wife looking at her sister’s husband/husband’s brother in a bad way just after 4 months of loosing her husband. This has happened all throughout the SM, so much ki they had to change the track.

No one is juatifying Ar now and everyone has the right to bash him at this point. Trust me, I dont want Ab to forgive him and want her to give his life lesson. But a thin line on where writers need to be “CALLED OUT” for such a hurried, headless chicken kind of story telling. This is totally missing in Ar’s case.

That time no body was called out for attending Moral science classes

Originally posted by: Debospeaks

Akshara's moving out of Udaipur while Neil's death was only justified by me and not the time she did while Arohi's death. It was her dumbest decision and the situation could have been handled better. You selectively mentioned only Akshara but conveniently forgot that Abhimanyu also did the same that Armaan did. He also chose Abhir over Ruhi. He may have reasons that Akshara was alone and pregnant but what excuse Armaan has that I should refrain myself from criticizing him???

His daughter was kidnapped by the nurse he himself appointed going against everyone's wish. From whom was he securing his daughter??? No one is devta and devi in this show, hence every character will be called out. Why would people be mocked for attending moral science lectures only when they criticize either Armaan or Abhimanyu????

I will not say akshara should go back to abhimanyu but she ran away from responsibilities. She could have stayed in udaipur and helped with whatever she can. But for her building her happy family facade was more important than fullfilling the promise given to dying people. Atleast armaan just saw rohith in his dream. It was not when rohith was alive and said that but for akshu the last words of both the dying people was to take care of their daughter.

Originally posted by: Ohgod!

Moral science was brought in only for criticising the members of the forum. It was never mentioned for criticising characters.

If some have the right to call Armaan or Ruhi or whoever else whatever they feel like, then others have the right to defend or love or hate whoever they want to.

But if another member starts to wonder or question how some other member likes a certain character, its definitely not cool and is surely MORAL POLICING!!!

So maybe it would be better if we start getting the facts right before saying whatever!!

No one here has said Armaan is right!! But liking Armaan for whatever other reasons is our prerogative just as much liking other characters is yours.

So it would be better if everyone keeps the discussion to the characters and stops wondering how other people can like or dislike characters!!

Originally posted by: Debospeaks

I myself call out every character for their absurd behavior, hence will do the same to Armaan also. Only problem is everyone lecturing to judge his character according to ITV norms and standards while they themselves went all out to call out Ruhi, Vidya, Kaveri, Yuvraj, etc. forgetting they were also ITV characters written by rishta's horrible writers.

That time no body was called out for attending Moral science classes

No one, absolutely no one is being called out because they're criticizing Armaan.

If anyone is being told about talking about moral science lessons, is because actual people were judged for liking, or supporting a ship, just because it did not fit in their moral purview.

So yeah, please call out Armaan's atrocities & criticize him all you want - but then similarly don't judge someone just because they choose to support or even want that character to be redeemed or even whitewashed because they want to see him unite with his wife again.

Originally posted by: Debospeaks

That's the same thing I also wanted to convey. Concluding every post with attending/not attending moral science lectures will only bring conflict in the forum. Better sense prevail.

Conflict was brought in because some people chose to call out members instead of characters. Now its just a response. Clearly, atleast Armaan fans are having to post a disclaimer everytime we say anything at all about him, because there are other members who wonder where our morality lies!!

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

i never supported abhimanyu when he left rooh nor i will go and justify saying he was correct.But after knowing Akshara is very dumb he can not leave his son too with that witch. More over abhimanyu had never promised anyone to take care of roohi. He did it with his own will but still i curse him for leaving rooh for witch like ak and he got his karma as he died before marrying her. But akshu leaving ruhi after giving promise to neil is worst thing. Neil risked his life to save his bhabhi( he would have never saved her if she would have not been his bhabhi). And his last wish was her bhabhi to take care of the child. So she just conveniently left without even thinking about child. Even after 6 years she had no hard feelings for that child whose father saved her.

I will not say akshara should go back to abhimanyu but she ran away from responsibilities. She could have stayed in udaipur and helped with whatever she can. But for her building her happy family facade was more important than fullfilling the promise given to dying people. Atleast armaan just saw rohith in his dream. It was not when rohith was alive and said that but for akshu the last words of both the dying people was to take care of their daughter.

Originally posted by: Ohgod!

Conflict was brought in because some people chose to call out members instead of characters. Now its just a response. Clearly, atleast Armaan fans are having to post a disclaimer everytime we say anything at all about him, because there are other members who wonder where our morality lies!!

Originally posted by: Debospeaks

Your hate for Akshu is leading you to justify Armaan who is doing the same things is ironical itself. Anyways this endless arguments will lead us nowhere hence its better to concentrate in the ongoing tracks rather than discussing the ones that are concluded almost two years back, otherwise we will end up discussing pages after pages but will never come to consensus

Why don't you add akshu as whatever you are saying for armaan for this gen holds good for ak too. 💁‍♀️ but may be your hate for armaan is stronger(that you are judging him too harshly in the end as you said he is doing same thing what his teacher did) or your love for ak was stronger so you were not able to see what she did to others during gen 3 but you are seeing that it's wrong when same thing done by armaan this gen 🤣

Ps 2 years ho yeah 4 yrs akshara is gen 4 character too and crime is a crime. And fortunately dkp lifted this track from gen 3 and did role reversal. 💁‍♀️