GHKPM New Season EDT # 6 - Page 84

Originally posted by: Nush_Rat

Agreed.

I can still accept Teju because she was young and with time if they developed her character, maybe there would be some hope. However Neil never worked for me because I don't think he actually understood his faults.

He knew Teju loved someone and still was glad when they got married. It was like getting a toy that you have dreamed of forever. I am pretty sure, if it wasn't Ruturaj, he wouldn't feel any remorse. It was more like he felt sorry for betraying his brother - otherwise he never cared for the supposed third person or how wrong it was to trap Teju in an unwanted marriage.

Whether it's S1, S2 or S2.5, at least they started off properly and mostly because all three of them were copies of three highly successful shows.

S4 was doomed from the beginning itself. Perhaps because Phagun Bou wasn't nearly as good or popular as KD, SAAKK or YHM.

I have mixed responses, Neil was a good man he did wrong in marriage fiasco still it wasn't solely his fault....He knew about her break up but got to know about her feelings post marriage....even gave chance to leave and followed duties unconditionally....He clearly realised he shouldn't have said yes and that's why accepted insult by Teju everytime....

But I had problems with her....she wasn't a kid grown up, infact a woman around 24....so unnecessarily disrespecting a guy from start and in end calling manipulator ,when she knew him very well was non sense let aside his favours....Teju wasn't just delulu, very arrogant also.....

S1 was the reason rest all got some importance as you can see they still picked Sairat concept again and again....and transformed MLs into dummy form of Virat let aside Savi as generational wealth....If it was started from surrogacy show dub jaata let aside other seasons....Sone pe suhaga was a new trial as S4, when they got reality check of their creativity....

Originally posted by: Nush_Rat

The thing is people change their opinion very fast and one hypocrisy I see in a lot of fans that when something is on air, they will bash it to no end and when another thing will come, suddenly they'll start praising the older one as if it was the best thing bestowed on the mankind.

I have interacted with some of the members here and they seemed like understand Savi's complexity and appreciated the character.

But now ever since this rebooted or whatever crap version has started, they are disregarding even the good things happening in the earlier season and making faults of Savi as of she was the worst FL possible.

I have nothing against the actors. I genuinely wish the best for them whether it is Vaibhabhi, Bhavika or Param.

But let's be honest, nothing set Teju apart as some of the S4 fans claim to degrade Savi. She did nothing significant. And nor was Neil any better character.

If Hitesh was available, the makers would waste no time in scraping this season.

Unfortunately Bhavika was available and they have merged both the storylines in the worst way possible.

As much as I hate the makers, I despise the fans' hypocrisy even more.

There was nothing between Teju & Neil on screen...They had very short time. Teju was fascinated by RR's talents and had a crush on him.Neil was her legal husband ......

Bhavika is " practical" she took the chance to work again ...It is difficult to get FL's roles twice now days ...

Originally posted by: Nush_Rat

The thing is people change their opinion very fast and one hypocrisy I see in a lot of fans that when something is on air, they will bash it to no end and when another thing will come, suddenly they'll start praising the older one as if it was the best thing bestowed on the mankind.

I have interacted with some of the members here and they seemed like understand Savi's complexity and appreciated the character.

But now ever since this rebooted or whatever crap version has started, they are disregarding even the good things happening in the earlier season and making faults of Savi as of she was the worst FL possible.

I have nothing against the actors. I genuinely wish the best for them whether it is Vaibhabhi, Bhavika or Param.

But let's be honest, nothing set Teju apart as some of the S4 fans claim to degrade Savi. She did nothing significant. And nor was Neil any better character.

If Hitesh was available, the makers would waste no time in scraping this season.

Unfortunately Bhavika was available and they have merged both the storylines in the worst way possible.

As much as I hate the makers, I despise the fans' hypocrisy even more.

I'm so sorry to jump in the midst of a conversation but this is so glaring that I have to point out.

I don't think anyone, be it the previous viewers or the new viewers, are bashing Savi's character from the previous seasons. We have not even watched those seasons so why on earth would we comment on that? We are bashing Savi who was injected into this season forcefully. You too agree that her character is butchered to the core. So I don't know what kind of hypocrisy you're talking about when it's clearly you who is giving backhanded comments for the Season 4 fans and the characters, saying they weren't as good as people are making out to be. You didn't like them, fine. But you don't really have the right to point our liking as "out of the blue" or "unnecessary".

We got to know about Savi and started making fun of her only after this makeover in the story took place. You seem to have polished opinions but they're nothing but indirect attacks on us who liked Tejaswini's story. Also, the point you're making about our changed opinions about Tejaswini and Neil is just baseless. Yes, we had criticized the actions of Neil and Tejaswini when the story was on air. That was the storyline and we absolutely criticised it because we had some brain-cells. However, we also witnessed the gradual change in their personalities and therefore, we were hoping that this change would lead to a redemption arc for the characters which obviously couldn't happen because of the makers. They weren't given as much time as they should've been given, unlike the previous whatever seasons you seem to be defending with all your might.

That's our only complaint: lack of interest and less time given by the channel and the makers since they had potential. I won't care about what you say for this statement since you seem to have a biased outlook towards this whole matter, even if you deny doing so.

So this entire point about us being "hypocritical", was just us being sane viewers going along with the ups and downs of the storyline and getting disappointed when it was abruptly cut short. I cannot have the same opinion about a story or a character throughout the course of the show blindly (I don't have blind allegiance to a character), unlike your constantly fanatic opinions over your previous Savi. I don't incessantly defend Neil or Tejaswini like they never did wrong just because I like them. That's not hypocrisy, that's having an errorless judgement of character. Unlike your unwavering opinions about the previous Savi.

I criticised and appreciated Neil and Tejaswini when they made mistakes and when they stood for the right respectively. That's not hypocrisy, that's viewing the show through different and evolving situations and perspectives.

However, you seem to be equating any shift/divergence of opinion from your own towards the said character/seasons as an act of double-standards.

We are not even bashing the viewers who liked Savi from previous seasons. We're bashing those who're defending her actions and her character in this stupid plot twist. However, you seem to be incessantly disliking and diminishing all other characters apart from your old Savi as if she was a legendary character. You seem to be constantly throwing shade on Tejaswini's story and season 4 viewers, and for your kind information we're not doing the same to the previous season fans the other way round.

You're just pointing out the fallacies in this season as if your favourite character's seasons were class apart. Come on, no one's buying that on ITV, some copied story and character that too from the Ganja makers is exceptionally wonderful, different, empowered and refreshing. It's hilarious to see that it's actually you who's trying to imply that Savi's character was "the best to be bestowed upon mankind". No one said that about Tejaswini actually. You just had a strawman argument.

I'm sorry to point this out, but in this entire nonsensical spectacle, you're the one coming across as a hypocrite and a hater.

Originally posted by: Sam_kmh

i haven't watched s3

for me it was the lack of promotion.. , timing to start a new show.. I only watched that mangalsutra promo only(.i liked it.) N due to my child ' s exams I haven't watched any show until mid march. Then ipl..

Characterization couldn't be the cause teju was young headstrong girl. I too agree she had some flaws but in real life too no one is perfect. She was like normal fun loving college going girl. Neil too had some flaws. It couldn't be the cause of season failure.. I have seen s1 n don't even ask me about virat's character n pattu . Sai too was not perfect

I agree, Neil was a flawed character. But that made his character believable. Also, some of his not so good actions don't take away the fact that he was a green flag. Green flags aren't always perfect. Even if a guy is a green flag, he can have weaknesses.

Originally posted by: Ashane25

This tweet was funny who says ITV doesn't teach you anything....

Satya- homewrecker, player, illegitimate child, selfish guy....

Great Adhikari mom....cheap woman had affair with a married guy even kid, dancer at night parties, sanki and matlabi as well....

And this mohtarma is like Virat was cheater ab ispe comment nhi karunga who was, but Mavshi ko problem kyun???

If I was Virat na main bolta tata bye bye main chala Girija ke paas...

Yaadein taaza ho gayi Ajab thanks a lot.....

@b: who’s home did he wreck ? Sai and Virat’s ? Please How the hell do you wreck a home that was already shaky in the first place?

Virat Chavan literally asked Sai to share their kid with Patralekha, knowing she committed a literal crime to surrogate their child. She emotionally blackmailed him, and yet he couldn’t stop feeling sorry for his “bhabhi”? What possible reason could he have had to commit such an atrocious act, other than the fact that he’s an insensitive and selfish individual?

Come on, Ashane bro, Satya didn’t “wreck” anyone’s home. In fact, Sai and Virat made the guy’s life hell, playing tag with him for no reason other than the fact that they are despicable people with no respect for anyone’s emotions but their own. Illegitimacy is not a character flaw. He didn’t choose to be illegitimate. You sound like those people in ITV who treat it as if it’s some dirty secret and look down on the person with disdain for no fault of theirs. Not to mention it sounds judgmental.

Originally posted by: Shirsha

I agree, Neil was a flawed character. But that made his character believable. Also, some of.. his not so good actions don't take away the fact that he was a green flag. Green flags aren't always perfect. Even if a guy is a green flag, he can have weaknesses.

Originally posted by: ThaneOfElsinore

I'm so sorry to jump in the midst of a conversation but this is so glaring that I have to point out.

I don't think anyone, be it the previous viewers or the new viewers, are bashing Savi's character from the previous seasons. We have not even watched those seasons so why on earth would we comment on that? We are bashing Savi who was injected into this season forcefully. You too agree that her character is butchered to the core. So I don't know what kind of hypocrisy you're talking about when it's clearly you who is giving backhanded comments for the Season 4 fans and the characters, saying they weren't as good as people are making out to be. You didn't like them, fine. But you don't really have the right to point our liking as "out of the blue" or "unnecessary".

We got to know about Savi and started making fun of her only after this makeover in the story took place. You seem to have polished opinions but they're nothing but indirect attacks on us who liked Tejaswini's story. Also, the point you're making about our changed opinions about Tejaswini and Neil is just baseless. Yes, we had criticized the actions of Neil and Tejaswini when the story was on air. That was the storyline and we absolutely criticised it because we had some brain-cells. However, we also witnessed the gradual change in their personalities and therefore, we were hoping that this change would lead to a redemption arc for the characters which obviously couldn't happen because of the makers. They weren't given as much time as they should've been given, unlike the previous whatever seasons you seem to be defending with all your might.

That's our only complaint: lack of interest and less time given by the channel and the makers since they had potential. I won't care about what you say for this statement since you seem to have a biased outlook towards this whole matter, even if you deny doing so.

So this entire point about us being "hypocritical", was just us being sane viewers going along with the ups and downs of the storyline and getting disappointed when it was abruptly cut short. I cannot have the same opinion about a story or a character throughout the course of the show blindly (I don't have blind allegiance to a character), unlike your constantly fanatic opinions over your previous Savi. I don't incessantly defend Neil or Tejaswini like they never did wrong just because I like them. That's not hypocrisy, that's having an errorless judgement of character. Unlike your unwavering opinions about the previous Savi.

I criticised and appreciated Neil and Tejaswini when they made mistakes and when they stood for the right respectively. That's not hypocrisy, that's viewing the show through different and evolving situations and perspectives.

However, you seem to be equating any shift/divergence of opinion from your own towards the said character/seasons as an act of double-standards.

We are not even bashing the viewers who liked Savi from previous seasons. We're bashing those who're defending her actions and her character in this stupid plot twist. However, you seem to be incessantly disliking and diminishing all other characters apart from your old Savi as if she was a legendary character. You seem to be constantly throwing shade on Tejaswini's story and season 4 viewers, and for your kind information we're not doing the same to the previous season fans the other way round.

You're just pointing out the fallacies in this season as if your favourite character's seasons were class apart. Come on, no one's buying that on ITV, some copied story and character that too from the Ganja makers is exceptionally wonderful, different, empowered and refreshing. It's hilarious to see that it's actually you who's trying to imply that Savi's character was "the best to be bestowed upon mankind". No one said that about Tejaswini actually. You just had a strawman argument.

I'm sorry to point this out, but in this entire nonsensical spectacle, you're the one coming across as a hypocrite and a hater.

Why you make such a long post on this ....Each person entitled to their own opinion...Savi's character imaginary 🤔...Savi was there for a long time in the series ...Teju had a very short time , developed in to nothing g " makers " just killed the character...

....Any ways every thing is " temporary this Savi too will disappear soon"....

Originally posted by: Tanvi_vault

Yes, I agree with you. I really loved Savi in Season 2 too but bringing her into this season didn’t feel needed and her character got butchered. TejNeil had a lot of potential. If the makers gave them more time, they could have become very popular. Their story was getting better but ended too soon. It’s okay to change our opinions as the story changes. We saw when Tejaswini and Neil made mistakes and when they got better. That is just normal. Everyone likes different characters and that’s okay. But honestly after Tejaswini’s and Rajat's tragic deaths this season the story has become badly written, confusing, and very disappointing. It ruined what could have been a great story

No need to get so serious about this puke worthy " ITV serials" ...It is not only here , every where it is the same ...This makers do the show not to create perfect characters or righteous characters they do it because they want to make " profit " it is a business ...Taking it too close to heart will only harm " mental peace "... laugh and forget it.....Why would even care much ...we must get entertained ...Have fun ...Let Param & Bhavika make some money along with the makers .

Originally posted by: missFiesty_69

@b: who’s home did he wreck ? Sai and Virat’s ? Please How the hell do you wreck a home that was already shaky in the first place?

Virat Chavan literally asked Sai to share their kid with Patralekha, knowing she committed a literal crime to surrogate their child. She emotionally blackmailed him, and yet he couldn’t stop feeling sorry for his “bhabhi”? What possible reason could he have had to commit such an atrocious act, other than the fact that he’s an insensitive and selfish individual?

Come on, Ashane bro, Satya didn’t “wreck” anyone’s home. In fact, Sai and Virat made the guy’s life hell, playing tag with him for no reason other than the fact that they are despicable people with no respect for anyone’s emotions but their own. Illegitimacy is not a character flaw. He didn’t choose to be illegitimate. You sound like those people in ITV who treat it as if it’s some dirty secret and look down on the person with disdain for no fault of theirs. Not to mention it sounds judgmental.

Virat was a mix of every thing until surrogacy he was OK...He couldn't accept Sai's rejection..But then he was the one told her nit to " expect " Any thing from him & the marriage since he can't love any one ...or something thing like that

Sathya didn't break Sai & Virat destroyed their marriage ...Sai & Sathya got married with different intention , Sai wanted Vinu's family together , Sathya wanted his mother's wish to complete. ...So technically every one had their on motives ....Sathya was actually a very good man who let Sai move on, requested Virat to propose Sai again...if not biased Sathya comes out as a very good person at the end ...

Sathya may bot be strong like Sai or Vrat but he genuinely loved Sai , Savi & Vinu ...It was heart warming to see Savi calling " Sattu uncle"...