Confusion about bigamist Akshara - Page 7

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

But he did run away from responsibilities, he had an option to go to court because he had Abhir's custody, Akshara couldn't take him away. Abhimanyu's decision was as wrong as Akshara's decision and more so because Akshara was pathetic, she didn't care about anyone but he was leaving his family who needed him more

So I do blame him much more than her in this case

Since he and Akshara are on good terms he might not want to take it legal way as it would have created discord. He also considered Ak's baby in her tummy as he took baby's responsibility willingly. Akshara was trying to go alone in pregnancy state and despite his efforts she wanted to go. I remember he said he wanted to take care of 3 of his children. Ruhi had both families and Akshara, baby and Abhir had no one to take care. He took the decision based on that. Not saying Ruhi don't need Abhi. He was going to come back..as for temporary arrangement he said that. If he was planning to stay with them without intention of returning I would have called it completely wrong. Mahima also agreed with his decision somehwere because she felt the situatuion needed it. Sometimes, given the situation, certain decisions are needed to taken to take step by step to solve the problem without escalating.

Temporarily going away to sort out the situation and thinking of coming back is not necessarily running away from responsibilities imo. It is a different story he died. It is not the wise choice but decision was not completely wrong either. That's what I think.

People can interpret it different ways; I can also get your pov. From what I see it, it was complex.That's why I said his decision was debatable.

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

But he did run away from responsibilities, he had an option to go to court because he had Abhir's custody, Akshara couldn't take him away. Abhimanyu's decision was as wrong as Akshara's decision and more so because Akshara was pathetic, she didn't care about anyone but he was leaving his family who needed him more

So I do blame him much more than her in this case

🛶 and akshara ki true lub story

Akshara needed fatherji.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DE4SxrfvfR1/?igsh=YzljYTk1ODg3Zg==

🛶 needed faces to fill his photo frames

In the end 🛶 ji ka mission was accomplished. He, Akshara, Bhaiji and Blue Amma (who must be dead) can be put in those photo frames

I hope Besht MAA wrote in her diary that 🛶 ki final wishes is for those frames to be filled so that Abheera can do this noble task

Originally posted by: Ajab.Pehchan

In the end 🛶 ji ka mission was accomplished. He, Akshara, Bhaiji and Blue Amma (who must be dead) can be put in those photo frames

I hope Besht MAA wrote in her diary that 🛶 ki final wishes is for those frames to be filled so that Abheera can do this noble task

Ye hotha hai true lub.

Akshara is psychopath killer and her husband collects their photo to fill his photo frame. Kaash ye story aage badtha 🤩

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

🛶 and akshara ki true lub story

Akshara needed fatherji.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DE4SxrfvfR1/?igsh=YzljYTk1ODg3Zg==

🛶 needed faces to fill his photo frames

This is an apt reel for Navra's turu lobe story. Both of them found what they wanted. Boat ji's daughter is keeping khali photo frame taking forward this legacy.

Originally posted by: ShadowImbue

No, divorce can be finalized even if one spouse is absent from court, particularly if they have abandoned the other. Mostly 2 year period is required for abandonment by spouse but if spouse is cruel or committed adultery, or mutually agreed for divorce even after being absent, divorce is finalized. Did they show Abhimanyu never finalize divorce in Akshara's absence in Gen 3? Abhimanyu begged and pleaded infront of Abhinav to return back his legally wedded wife? If divorce was never finalized then how could Abhimanyu marry Arohi post-leap?

You have answered your own questions

Akshara married within 6 months of running away from home which is not a sufficient time for a divorce decree to be issued

Abhimanyu didn't contest her marriage, it is non cognizable offense when Abhimanyu did not register any complaint, there were no legal proceedings against Akshara

When Abhimanyu met Abhinav, 5 years had passed, now you add the 2 years abandonment clause and you have a divorce that's why I said Abhira is a legitimate child because Akshara's marriage wasn't contested and as time passed it was legalized but there is no time limit for Abhimanyu to file bigamy charges against Akshara, he could do that after 3 years, 5 years and 30 years

But him not taking an action doesn't mean the crime wasn't committed, like Armaan, Shivani didn't file a case against Vidya and Kaveri, they don't even mention what all they did as a crime, it doesn't mean I don't have the brain to know that a crime was committed

Originally posted by: Manny_123

Since he and Akshara are on good terms he might not want to take it legal way as it would have created discord. He also considered Ak's baby in her tummy as he took baby's responsibility willingly. Akshara was trying to go alone in pregnancy state and despite his efforts she wanted to go. I remember he said he wanted to take care of 3 of his children. Ruhi had both families and Akshara, baby and Abhir had no one to take care. He took the decision based on that. Not saying Ruhi don't need Abhi. He was going to come back..as for temporary arrangement he said that. If he was planning to stay with them without intention of returning I would have called it completely wrong. Mahima also agreed with his decision somehwere because she felt the situatuion needed it. Sometimes, given the situation, certain decisions are needed to taken to take step by step to solve the problem without escalating.

Temporarily going away to sort out the situation and thinking of coming back is not necessarily running away from responsibilities imo. It is a different story he died. It is not the wise choice but decision was not completely wrong either. That's what I think.

People can interpret it different ways; I can also get your pov. From what I see it, it was complex.That's why I said his decision was debatable.

Ruhi had both families but her both families consists of dada pardada dadis and nanis

Kairav and Muskan had left, Ruhi had lost her mother then she lost her father figure because Abhimanyu's priority was a delusional woman who knew nothing but to run away

The decision was wrong and both of his kids and he paid for it but I agree there are many ways to think about it

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

You have answered your own questions

Akshara married within 6 months of running away from home which is not a sufficient time for a divorce decree to be issued

Abhimanyu didn't contest her marriage, it is non cognizable offense when Abhimanyu did not register any complaint, there were no legal proceedings against Akshara

When Abhimanyu met Abhinav, 5 years had passed, now you add the 2 years abandonment clause and you have a divorce that's why I said Abhira is a legitimate child because Akshara's marriage wasn't contested and as time passed it was legalized but there is no time limit for Abhimanyu to file bigamy charges against Akshara, he could do that after 3 years, 5 years and 30 years

But him not taking an action doesn't mean the crime wasn't committed, like Armaan, Shivani didn't file a case against Vidya and Kaveri, they don't even mention what all they did as a crime, it doesn't mean I don't have the brain to know that a crime was committed

Did they show a scene that Abhimanyu never submitted divorce papers in court? He had them all along locked up in a cupboard?

Originally posted by: ShadowImbue

Did they show Abhimanyu never submitted divorce papers in court? He had them all along locked up in a cupboard?

Even if Abhimanyu submitted divorce papers in court, both parties have to attend hearings which Akshara didn't

Not attending divorce proceedings won't fasten it, it delays it

Most importantly since Akshara and Abhimanyu weren't living separately for one year before filing for divorce which is mandatory for mutual consent divorce

Signing a paper is not divorce, I can agree that Abhimanyu filed for exparte procedure but that takes 2-3 years

The fact that she married within 5-6 months of signing divorce papers makes it bigamy, she never followed any legal procedure

Akshara, by running away, not disclosing about her pregnancy and not filing a proper divorce case committed many frauds and crimes