FILMS LIKE CHAAVA MAKES RIGHT WINGERS PROPAGANDA STRONGER & MORE TOXIC

Please provide reasons in comments section for your voting

Everything is a propaganda except some people's perpetual victimhood (while being the actual aggressors) 🫤

The good thing is more & more people (all over the world) are now realising how they have been fooled in the name of secularism & a certain phobia.

Wonder what movies Pakistan was making to ethnically cleanse the country of all minorities. Systematically wiping out the Hindu/Sikh population which stood at 23% in 1947 to less than 3% today.

https://www.hudson.org/human-rights/cleansing-pakistan-of-minorities

Honestly I don't understand where's the propaganda?? The movie was based on true events of history ab itna bhi nahi dikha sakte kya?? We all know that aurangzeb was a monster so what's the big deal if his cruelty is shown in a movie??

Their having a town meeting to discuss

https://youtu.be/8TiVyx4rnaE?si=qpSPA26NSus5Hr_0

ABSOLUTELY!

Such films often glorify historical figures in a way that aligns with nationalist sentiments while omitting complexities, contradictions, or alternative perspectives. This creates a one-dimensional, hero-worshipping narrative that fuels right-wing ideology.

Anyway, Hindutva has corrupted the nation.

In today's time everything looks like a propaganda. But it was a historical movie. If they showed anything wrong, history experts can easily point it out.

we had movie on Alauddin khilji. he was shown as a villain like he was irl.

At a time when the ruling ideology is actively rewriting textbooks and erasing inconvenient truths, calling a film ‘just history’ is naive.

If these films were purely about history, they wouldn’t need political endorsements, tax exemptions, and state-backed promotions to push their narratives.

Ofc political parties are using it to their full advantage given the current situation of the country.

but history shown in the movie is not false.

Originally posted by: mintyblue

At a time when the ruling ideology is actively rewriting textbooks and erasing inconvenient truths, calling a film ‘just history’ is naive.

If these films were purely about history, they wouldn’t need political endorsements, tax exemptions, and state-backed promotions to push their narratives.

If the truth benefits a political party, that doesn't mean it's not the truth. If a film was made on Babri Masjid, Islamic fundamentalists would use it as propaganda against Hindus. That doesn't mean it's not the truth. That's outright stupid.

It says a lot that some 'liberals' have an issue with a negative portrayal of Aurangzeb. I'm glad some movies are being made. A lot of closet Islamists and Islamic apologists are being unmasked.