Understand your point on longer monologues. Writers do it on purpose avoiding long monologues so they dont get caught on contradictions worse than already ocurred. Its such a life. Write rubbish that you wont be picked up as rubbish by viewers... then go to the pub... I mean Muktas caravan to talk about the show. Theres no difference!
The scene. Yeah so Amu packed up & walked up stairs very slowly or dramatically. Dildar came and said like nimmi after Annulment. If Amu leaves it will be forever. He didnt go only to return earing but Jahan told him where Amu interview was for cough syrup scene.
The day virat says he dont care if Amu leaves forever... promise we will all get cake & do a zoom call 🍾🍾🍰🍰
Originally posted by: Adiandsid
Her 'longer' thought monologues were important in these places. What she was shown doing changed over a period of time but without any valid reasons being shown.
- When she came after Dildaar asked her to - there was only one or two thoughts of hers. Should've been longer. In a way short is good... but only if it is written well. Those thoughts looked more like an excuse to come back rather than determination to prove her innocence.
- After Laddu thing, I think her pov changed. She didn't want to expose Babita but show her that her being with ex is dangerous, that she will backstab her. There was a short monologue there.. but again not enough. by the time Virat is flirting with her and probably she is too - and no thoughts around what she feels about what he did.
- Annulment... she was sad he wants to end the relationship. no idea why that change.
In the least, I can accept her being around Virat thinking 'I am giving him the chance to improve, correct his mistake.... why? because I hope he will change. i dont want him to fall down because of me...'... idk... just made that up.
[I don't remember Virat ran back with earring. need to see that. Goes with what he did after his talk with Bhavani... another earring scene... forget what Bhavani told him.]


330