Is it a submission to masculine supremacy, or a display of solidarity? - Page 4

Originally posted by: Swetha-Sai

More fighting in RS between Jaya ji and the speaker

They fight on the taxpayers money. They should be fined for doing so.

I've maintained my maiden name because it would have been a hassle get all the documents changed to married name. I believe 'to each their own' if someone wants to change their name and take husband's name and/or last name.

Originally posted by: NerdyMukta

They fight on the taxpayers money. They should be fined for doing so.

Yes

I believe agar attendance kam hain, property damage and time waste karte hain faltu mein.

Toh inke paise kaatne chahiye.

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

The issue has been a point of contention between the two! On July 5, the two engaged in an argument on the same issue, and again on Friday.

The intended conversation and tone between the two parliamentarians, —one is a longstanding member of parliament and the other is the chairperson of the RS—seem to be misunderstood at the end and are akin to a domino effect: action > reaction > proaction, and finally exertion!

Regardless of their political affiliations, they are still representatives chosen by the public and tasked with upholding the upper house's principles, and values.

Discussions are always necessary, but those shouldn't turn into arguments. If that happens, no one will win, and democracy will be defeated.

Is this a case of ego causing havoc?

No it started

When Deputy Chairman Harivansh Narayan Singh called her.

He went by the rules still she was super rude to him. In return he still respected her but she continued being rude to him and disrespected the Chair for no reason.

Then with Jagdeep Dhankar ji, she herself started as Jaya AB.

Later instead of talking something sense, she went on did you get lunch break, brought Jairam Ramesh.

She has just wasted the time of Parliament. Bcoz she knows her party has nothing to talk about.

She won't say anything about the minor's rape accused from her party. & the level of filth Akhilesh her party supremo is saying to defend and rather blaming the victim.

That's why this faltu drama is going on with Sonia Gandhi standing next to her.

They won't say anything about Waynad floods that could be avoided if they followed when Center gave them warnings or the minorities being killed in Bangladesh.

Also about

A young female doctor at RG Kar Medical College was raped and murdered during her 36-hour duty shift In Bengal.

This matter is not related to feminism, submission or anything.

It is just to hide all the incompetence done by her Party and her INDI Alliance members.

They should start addressing her as Her Highness.

I think it is a personal choice and I don't think in any region adding husband's name after marriage is mandatory.

In the case in question, the speaker read the name as it was mentioned on the form. If Jaya has an objection, she can just get it changed and move on.

Cheers..

Originally posted by: Savera84

I think it is a personal choice and I don't think in any region adding husband's name after marriage is mandatory.

In the case in question, the speaker read the name as it was mentioned on the form. If Jaya has an objection, she can just get it changed and move on.

Cheers..

Exactly on point

There is no compulsion

This

Jaya Bacchan wants Vice President to apologize for no fault of his.

But has no problem in insulting others.

According to her only deserves respect and every other person shouldn't be treated well by her and her alliance members

https://x.com/Sanju_Verma_/status/1821960394870812792

They were just sparring!