Is it a submission to masculine supremacy, or a display of solidarity? - Page 3

It's their personal choice.

No comment on their personal life.

Just remembered this incident seeing Jaya's reaction.

https://youtu.be/rejdFkhyasg

Gun Label; Masculine Supremacy & Solidarity!

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

There is a widespread, though not universal, custom for a newly married wife to adopt the husband's family name.

As feminism and women's empowerment create a tidal wave of change in India, the young generation's mindset and opinions are shifting.

Considering the fate of 21st-century Indian brides, Betterhalf.ai, a new age matrimony app survey to ascertain the opinions and perspectives of the young Indian population on the customs followed by Indian society. The survey results show which customs should be kept and which should be abandoned as time passes.

Read more at: https://www.deccanherald.com/india/92-of-indian-youth-believe-that-it-is-normal-not-to-use-husbands-surname-report-1108856.html

Thanks for the tag Madhu

Count me in these 92% as I am not using my husband’s name and last name. I still known by my maiden name. Though its a choice or sometimes like my case it was necessity as back in the days name change in passports, aadhar card etc used to be a headaches my friend had gone through the nightmare and she told me keep your name as it is. 7-8 years ago My mom only had a spell change in her passport like a minor change from letter ‘I’ to ‘Ee’ as an agent messed it up for years and she had to go through nightmare as well. Hence I decided I will keep my name as it is on all documents.

Originally posted by: rckRadhe

https://youtu.be/rejdFkhyasg

Gun Label; Masculine Supremacy & Solidarity!

Thanks for sharing this.

https://www.indiaforums.com/article/jaya-bachchan-gets-a-suggestion-from-jagdeep-dhankar-to-avoid-amitabh-bachchans-name_209702

This fight is still going.. once in every few days..

https://www.indiaforums.com/article/jaya-bachchan-gets-into-a-clash-with-rajya-sabha-chairperson-jagdeep-dhankhar-you-may-be-celebrity-b_209878

More fighting in RS between Jaya ji and the speaker

She clearly over reacts.

More strength to both Dhankhad & Birla, for tolerating bad behavior from some members of both houses.

Originally posted by: mnx12

She clearly over reacts.

More strength to both Dhankhad & Birla, for tolerating bad behavior from some members of both houses.

Exactly

She became MP for the 5th time and is MP for almost 2 decades.

If she had so much problem she could have changed it, but she didn't.

Even our Speaker Sir told her the rules and advised her if she has so much problem she can still get it changed there is a process.

Tab bhi isko problem ho gayi and started saying I am proud of my husband and other nonsense.

When she was called by her full name and did drama over it.

Uske baad khud isne 2 baar Amitabh laga kar khudko address kiya hain.

Opposition ko sahi muddo per baat nahi karni sirf faltu baatein karni hain and Sadan ka time waste karna hain.

Also in India there is no compulsion to add even Husband ka surname, uska naam toh dur ki baat hain.

U can just write your maiden surname, middle name hona compulsory bhi hain.

Mere ghar mein just my father has a middle name

Originally posted by: Palak2812

Exactly

She became MP for the 5th time and is MP for almost 2 decades.

If she had so much problem she could have changed it, but she didn't.

Even our Speaker Sir told her the rules and advised her if she has so much problem she can still get it changed there is a process.

Tab bhi isko problem ho gayi and started saying I am proud of my husband and other nonsense.

When she was called by her full name and did drama over it.

Uske baad khud isne 2 baar Amitabh laga kar khudko address kiya hain.

Opposition ko sahi muddo per baat nahi karni sirf faltu baatein karni hain and Sadan ka time waste karna hain.

The intended conversation and tone between the two parliamentarians, —one is a longstanding member of parliament and the other is the chairperson of the RS—seem to be misunderstood at the end and are akin to a domino effect: action > reaction > proaction, and finally exertion!

Regardless of their political affiliations, they are still representatives chosen by the public and tasked with upholding the upper house's principles, and values.

Discussions are always necessary, but those shouldn't turn into arguments. If that happens, no one will win, and democracy will be defeated.

Is this a case of ego causing havoc?