Originally posted by: sharadrocks
I am just wondering here if the definition of insaaf would’ve changed if the car had been driven by the driver of the Goenkas instead of Ruhi....a poor man with four daughters, buddhe maa baap and the works ..if the Goenkas had still offered to take care of all the medical and all other expenses of the victim, would there have been a hue and cry for insaaf..when the victim and the culprit are from the same social-economic backgrounds !
If the poor man had a fight with his wife .. and was driving like a maniac for the whole day .. and was also taking panic therapy ..
then again I would say the man deserves to get punished.. if the driver has not checked that car is faulty .. that’s the drivers problem .. why did you not check
Since the person did not get killed .. Ruhi should serve some damage ..license revoked , serving community service
They should have shown Abhira talking with the victims before hand .. rather than being shown unaware of what she’s proposing.. Abhira made a filmy entry .. why ???you are a newbie why should you make the judge wait .if she had spoken to them beforehand and this conversation shown as flashbacks after verdict .. it would have made more sense
I have the unfortunate experience of watching a case in Indian court .. the judge sits on the chair .. And the clients come one by one with their lawyers and deal with the issue .. and the judge give the hearing ..it was also a road accident..
yes damages were paid because only the car was damaged .. no person was hurt ..
but it still took 2 years to resolve because police had filed a case .. Infact the opposition did not even collect the damages .. we just paid the fine and closed off the case after 2 years
The court case was badly done but other part of the show is good especially the Vidya conversation… and Armaan Abd Abhira acknowledging themselves as hubby wife
Edited by Aadi04 - 1 years ago
0