Originally posted by: CuckooCutter7
only thing about BBC that remains is the colonial era name. The content is all BS, put together by the usual left-wing wokes who are anti-Hindu, anti-India. Some of these nut jobs are in fact Indians... who act as brown sepoys for their colonial masters. A few of them getting together and putting together a hit piece on Modi has less than 0 credibility... in the face of 10 years of concerted congress effort to nail Modi which they tried very hard to do. Indian courts, with many congress appointed judges, also exonerated him of any wrong-doing. But who will explain all this to the crowd that doesn't want to get educated and for whom all logic is alien?
It's something repeated again & again...so nothing new on that matter...and that will remain so, I suppose. History is full of examples where people are/were manipulated into a certain thinking where truth only plays a minuscule role (or none at all)... 
Modi had Mukul Rohatgi as a lawyer (he had been General attorny for 3 years at the beginning of Modi's first 'round') during a trial in 2021 dealing with Modi's involvement 2002...to me, it says a lot that SRK adressed him to put an end to the judicial farce law did with his son...and that Rohatgi declined Modi's offer to retake the job of attorny general during Modi's second 'round' (after that trial) is interesting, too.
Edit: not responding to the two other posts...we both know our position, don't we?
Edited by Clochette - 1 years ago
11