Originally posted by: TheMinion
Well, I'm a thorough gentleman
ladies ka dil nahin tod sakta, so I'll share my analysis for you to haha
Here are some of my observations:
I totally cracked up when narbhakshi Trijata got kaddu ki sabzi for Prachi
![]()
Less said about Lanka track the better. Now I feel they added all that unnecessary stuff maybe because they wanted to show Hanuman story on Hanuman Jayanti. But then, they could've stretched other tracks instead of torturing me by showing Prachi roaming around
What was that Akshay Kumar stuff? His matching outfit, hairstyle and jewelry with Meghnaad
Lakshman is the man. And so in Sugreev. Why didn't they cast him as Hanuman? He is an amazing actor, showed different aspects of Vaali and Sugreev so well. I'm glad they answered all my questions regarding this story. Convincing me further that there are indeed two teams working on two tracks
VFX has been quite good considering it's ITV.
I so agree, the moment I saw Kesari, I was like, now this is a vanar, now we are talking
Also, why are vanars not marrying vanaris? (funny question, please don't start targeting me for this, because this time I will retaliate
)
Baby Hanuman's super cute tail
As long as they don't show Prachi giving gyaan, I'm happy. I have honestly started skipping Prachi and Ravan scenes, can't tolerate at all. Poor story, poorer acting.
P.S. Bring back Ekjata
Bold- i was also wondering same. Maybe they did marry lady vanars but mytho shows don't want to show lady as vanar😅😂.
Does anyone know reason?
ladies ka dil nahin tod sakta, so I'll share my analysis for you to haha 



)


64