Upcoming Elections - Vote with a conscience - Page 94

https://x.com/ani/status/1776175706642534582?s=46&t=Q96IWrDq2C9bhu2B8fjITg

Originally posted by: Vr15h

Are you a fan of Bill Gates? He's the person trying to depopulate the world, and has been pushing things like experimental drugs, eating mealworms & bugs, & all sorts of sociopathic policies from his foundation. In 2009, after one of his projects resulted in the sterilization of the target group, he was banned from India for a while

Once upon a time - in the 90s, I used to be a fan of Microsoft. That time is long past, as Microsoft itself has morphed into a completely woke company, like a lot of others, and Gates himself these days finds his name listed along w/ other sociopaths, like Klaus Schwabb, Anthony Fauci, Dr Tedros and so on. This govt has decided to make a quick buck by endorsing his programs so that he can do his thing w/o them having to spend a paisa, and then they can take credit for all the "development" that happens when people are damaged by their experimental vaccines/drugs/what have you

Why does it matter if I am a fan or not. What was my point ? And the point of that video ? Did you understand the gist of it ?

One party and leader is speaking of the future and using AI for real time translation and another one is roaming the country speaking of casteism etc and another is in jail and so on …

Originally posted by: KJasoosChulbulP

Why does it matter if I am a fan or not. What was my point ? And the point of that video ? Did you understand the gist of it ?

One party and leader is speaking of the future and using AI for real time translation and another one is roaming the country speaking of casteism etc and another is in jail and so on …

Comparisons w/ Rahul Gandhi or other I.N.D.I.A. leaders are passe. It's like comparing an Indian cricket team w/ Zimbabwe's

My point was the future that they are contemplating is a dark, dystopian future where depopulation would be a major agenda point for one, and the other is happy to play along so long as the former is the one bankrolling the agenda

Originally posted by: KJasoosChulbulP

https://x.com/Incognito_qfs/status/1775727176710578200

The friends episode ka scene. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

This scene was epic: Chander being forced to take the flight to Yemen

Incidentally, I had no idea that even in the 90s, they'd have had direct flights to Yemen. They'd probably have had to go via Emirates

Originally posted by: Vr15h

Comparisons w/ Rahul Gandhi or other I.N.D.I.A. leaders are passe. It's like comparing an Indian cricket team w/ Zimbabwe's

My point was the future that they are contemplating is a dark, dystopian future where depopulation would be a major agenda point for one, and the other is happy to play along so long as the former is the one bankrolling the agenda

Depopulation ka maloom naheen and they aren’t speaking of that. It’s your inference that technology boost will lead to that.

Your arguement is basically implying that India should refrain from embracing and adopting technology and advances due to your inferences ? Ofc aisa to naheen hoga but naah. India not prepared to give up the tremendous growth chart it is on

Originally posted by: KJasoosChulbulP

can you believe she is official spokesperson of INC ? 😟🤔🥹.

BTW - I have decided that there is no such term as Isalamphobia - a coin made by propagandists to set their own narratives when there is opposition or concern to the hate/ violence they spew.

The term "islamophobia" is fraudulent, for so many reason:

➤ A phobia is an irrational fear of something. There is nothing irrational about fearing muslims, particularly observant ones, if one is familiar w/ the contents of quran and sunnah

➤ To date, there has been only one attack on muslims - the one in that mosque in Christchurch, NZ a few years ago. Even the one in Norway wasn't done against muslims. By contrast, there have been >45,000 jihad attacks since 9/11. The idea that islamophobia is a more serious threat than Kafirophobia is laughable, if it were not so lethal

➤ In mainstream media, the term "islamophobia" conflates 2 things. One is any anti-muslim attacks on someone just for being a muslim, but the more lethal one is any and all criticism of islam, be it their texts, their practices, their history. In short, it's just a way to silence people

In short, the best response to the accusations of being islamophobic is "yes", and then continue w/ whatever argument one is making

Originally posted by: KJasoosChulbulP

I don’t know of anti Hindu. But definitely anti Indian or perhaps sometimes afraid to be one so they feel they have to take an opposite view - like one economics professor session I attended. Was intense about india buying oil but had no response to Europe etc (from Russia).

They're not anti-Indian: they happily have all the anti-Hindu Indians that there are. They had no issues w/ the old secular socialist India. They hate the current regime due to the perception that it's Hindu, even though Hindus have gotten the short end of the stick time & again. (In fact, it's more dangerous to be a Hindu now than it was in the 80s or 90s in most of India). The Indian woke brigades have just taken the Western template of "White man bad", applied it to Brahmins, & are off to the races

India most likely will never elect a secular govt again outside the BJP. But if they did, you'll see them stop hating India again. Just like they stopped hating Brazil after Bolsonairo's exit

Originally posted by: KJasoosChulbulP

Depopulation ka maloom naheen and they aren’t speaking of that. It’s your inference that technology boost will lead to that.

Your arguement is basically implying that India should refrain from embracing and adopting technology and advances due to your inferences ? Ofc aisa to naheen hoga but naah. India not prepared to give up the tremendous growth chart it is on

No, I'm saying that India should be wary of what's being offered. What the New World Order has in store is pretty dystopian

Depopulation is a major issue. First of all, the only reason India is as attractive as China to the Corporate West is the potential markets of a billion plus. Take that away, and India would be as attractive as Kenya for those people. As it is, all this stuff about GDP is total GDP, not per capita. So w/o increasing per capita GDP, a loss in population will result in a loss in GDP as well

Right now, we may not like the fact that India has the world's largest population. But looking at the collapsing birthrates even in India: it's <2 for non-muslims, and the only reason India is at 2.1 is that muslims are at 2.4. So after a while, the population will peak, before staring to decrease as the death rate exceeds the birth rate. After enough of that has happened, India will become as hollow as Japan when it comes to its continual existence. (Notice that I have not even touched on potential islamization)

Originally posted by: Vr15h

No, I'm saying that India should be wary of what's being offered. What the New World Order has in store is pretty dystopian

Depopulation is a major issue. First of all, the only reason India is as attractive as China to the Corporate West is the potential markets of a billion plus. Take that away, and India would be as attractive as Kenya for those people. As it is, all this stuff about GDP is total GDP, not per capita. So w/o increasing per capita GDP, a loss in population will result in a loss in GDP as well

Right now, we may not like the fact that India has the world's largest population. But looking at the collapsing birthrates even in India: it's <2 for non-muslims, and the only reason India is at 2.1 is that muslims are at 2.4. So after a while, the population will peak, before staring to decrease as the death rate exceeds the birth rate. After enough of that has happened, India will become as hollow as Japan when it comes to its continual existence. (Notice that I have not even touched on potential islamization)

Long long time and no one can predict the future to the extent you are saying.

In fact what you are mentioning - population - is a double edged sword. One can argue that it’s already way too high to manage with less resources size of land etc. Frankly not worried about population reduction at this time. In fact tech will be a huge help for the massive popn. And slow slow down in birth rate for a bit isn’t bad at all at this juncture. Some negative growth rate overall in popn for a decade would help propel growth in fact. Hoping Neighbors have their own CAA and some can leave :). 😈. 1 lakh per family for all extremists and their families to leave :).

Originally posted by: KJasoosChulbulP

Long long time and no one can predict the future to the extent you are saying.

In fact what you are mentioning - population - is a double edged sword. One can argue that it’s already way too high to manage with less resources size of land etc. Frankly not worried about population reduction at this time. In fact tech will be a huge help for the massive popn. And slow slow down in birth rate for a bit isn’t bad at all at this juncture. Some negative growth rate overall in popn for a decade would help propel growth in fact. Hoping Neighbors have their own CAA and some can leave :). 😈. 1 lakh per family for all extremists and their families to leave :).

I hate to say it this way, but if you want population reduction, the best thing to hope for is for older people to die off. But a reduced birth rate is catastrophic, as most of the world - Europe, Japan, Canada.... are all discovering. What they did was discover that their own people weren't interested in kids, then inviting muslims from all over into their countries (even Japan and Korea, which never had muslims, now have them!) and then having all sorts of issues. If this plays out in India, Akhand Bharat of the BJP will be realized via Ghazwa-e-Hind. The illustration below may be Euro-related, but would very much apply to India if it plays out

https://www.instagram.com/p/BX2RBtwgpte/