Pracchand Ashok - Episode Discussion Thread #2 - Page 98

Originally posted by: NostalgiaLove

Neither depiction is accurate, he wasn't a mahan sant nor he was a clown 🤡 he was a prince and a very dangerous man, he should be shown ruthless, fearless but in a classy way 😐

I liked the Chakravarti samrat better than this BS . I dun think they will ever show his personality according to historical records. They want romanticize everything

Originally posted by: Manny_123

https://www.instagram.com/p/C4cmDQ5vOsQ/?igsh=MXU2OWNsb2pleW1iMA==

Ashock ko itna luchha kyu dikha re hai..an emperor has some sort of poise and the way they carry themselves..whats with him running around like a mad man

Originally posted by: Manny_123

I liked the Chakravarti samrat better than this BS . I dun think they will ever show his personality according to historical records. They want romanticize everything

Why can't he be shown as a neglected child and prince which shaped his personality and he became ambitious wanting respect. He probably lived with Devi to make a family that if he died in power struggle atleast his family would be hidden in Vidisha. 🙄 Well that's just an assumption.

Originally posted by: Neerasi29

Ashock ko itna luchha kyu dikha re hai..an emperor has some sort of poise and they way they carry themselves..whats with him running around like a mad man

The actors have been given directions like that as Chetan said. Possibly the director wants to insult the characters 😡

Originally posted by: Manny_123

I liked the Chakravarti samrat better than this BS . I dun think they will ever show his personality according to historical records. They want romanticize everything

I never liked Chakravartin Ashok Samrat but it was so much better than this BS

Originally posted by: Manny_123

https://www.instagram.com/p/C4cmDQ5vOsQ/?igsh=MXU2OWNsb2pleW1iMA==

Ek song yaad aagaya" kya se kya hogaye dekhte dekhte

Originally posted by: Neerasi29

Ashock ko itna luchha kyu dikha re hai..an emperor has some sort of poise and they way they carry themselves..whats with him running around like a mad man

Raja means poised and Royal rehna todi hota hai?

Kuch yaad aaaya

Originally posted by: Manny_123

I liked the Chakravarti samrat better than this BS . I dun think they will ever show his personality according to historical records. They want romanticize everything

I actually watched CSA before the leap.

Ioved Dharma , chanakya and Sidharth Nigam.

I am feeling bad to write this that Siddharth was better than adnaan in portraying AShock.

https://youtu.be/Y6P6pQOgmoI?si=M4-8efY4O8z5_B6j

Kalinga ki rajkumari aapne maayke jaate huye

They can't afford a sipaahi for her safely

Originally posted by: NostalgiaLove

Why can't he be shown as a neglected child and prince which shaped his personality and he became ambitious wanting respect. He probably lived with Devi to make a family that if he died in power struggle atleast his family would be hidden in Vidisha. 🙄 Well that's just an assumption.

So in serials they might want to exaggerate his character instead of showing him accurately for entertainment; since he is highly regarded makers might not want to depict his real character imo. These serials are very specific and attract certain type of audience. Channel might want to attract general audience by adding drama and romticization elements.

So if we want to see the history in its real sense I think web platform is ideal. They also can show the real depiction of Ashoka through movies. I would love if they could show actual Ashoka in other platfroms.