Originally posted by: Manavi_kesari
Wats the analogy n the whole story , details n context why yogi gave that example in UP assembly , details pls
Analogy is that the Pandavas wanted Indraprastha back, but were willing to compromise and accept 5 villages. That's the proposal Krishna gave the Kauravas. Duryodhan responded that he'd not yield even the area occupied by the eye of a needle. Result was an 18-day war that ended w/ the Kauravas all destroyed, and the Pandavas essentially ruling the world (or maybe just Aryavarta at the time)
That's the analogy DhoniFan and Yogi are using: Hindus want just 3 sites where temples were demolished and mosques raised in their places: Ayodhya, Varanasi and Mathura. Muslim side said no on all 3, but Ayodhya was won from them thanks to first the Kar Sevaks, and then the courts. They now are being asked for the other 2
Personally, I disagree: stolen property is stolen property, and Hindus are perfectly justified in asking for all 40,000 🛕 back, not just 3. The prediction is that as a result of the same obduracy as shown by the Kauravas, Hindus will end up winning all of them
