Gyanvapi: What is the reality? - Page 15

Originally posted by: KrishnaSourav

has anyone read the ASI survey report

Not yet… but know that chaar dwaar ke praman hai, west wall pe lakshmiji , hanumaan ji aur dusri pratima thi/ abhi bhi hai… They try to cover it with debris etc

but it’s available for general public thats what I heard

https://twitter.com/tanisqa4/status/1751247844303065224?s=46&t=p-z2dOB03vGwOQeuxPg3yQ

All these temples must be returned

Originally posted by: dusk2dawn

Not yet… but know that chaar dwaar ke praman hai, west wall pe lakshmiji , hanumaan ji aur dusri pratima thi/ abhi bhi hai… They try to cover it with debris etc

Originally posted by: KrishnaSourav

has anyone read the ASI survey report

https://twitter.com/News18UP/status/1751107364353097906

32 inscriptions have been found in the survey, which are clear evidence of the existence of the first Hindu temple there. Mention of Mahamuktimandap has also been found on three inscriptions (4, 8 and 29). ASI has described it as very important in its report. The Mahamuktimandapa helps prove the existence of Shiva's abode. Its description is also found in ancient texts. The inscriptions on the inscriptions are written in Devanagari, Telugu and Kannada. A pillar decorated with bells and a two meter wide well have been found. The western wall of the mosque is entirely part of the Hindu temple. The structures found in temples and sculptures of gods and goddesses are engraved on the inscriptions. The advocate for the temple side said that according to the report, the base of the present building in Gyanvapi is said to be resting on the remains of the huge temple. Lotus, Swastika symbols, bells etc. on the pillars on which the building rests are clear evidence of it being a Hindu temple. There is no scope for doubt that Gyanvapi was earlier a Hindu temple, which was demolished and a mosque was built.

Originally posted by: dhun.laagi

https://twitter.com/shakunimama420/status/1750805247143137729

https://twitter.com/SanatanPrabhat/status/1751266732998885745

https://twitter.com/Pamphlet_in/status/1751243665593237668

Watch this folks, it gives a summary of the entire survey.

I deeply respect Adv Hari Shankar Jain (father of Vishnu Jain) but strongly disagree w/ making it a "national monument". It should be restored to being a Shaivya Temple: nothing more, nothing less!

We need to stop letting Hindu property - both physical or intellectual - get appropriated by either political parties or the state. They belong not just to Hindus, but very specifically, their respective samprodayas. So the Ram Mandir would belong to people who primarily worship Shri Rama, Gyanvapi Mandir would belong to Shaivyas, Krishna Janmabhoomi to Vaishnav/Hare Krishna sect and so on!

All of these would have full rights in banning non-believers from their premises. You can't do that w/ a national monument: you'd have to allow in anyone who wants to come in. That would include people who consider worshiping or even honoring our deities as shirk, or people who consider our deities false gods as per the Ten Commandments

So no, tell the Waqf Board that the Gyanvapi is getting repossessed, no apologies made, no questions asked! For a very simple reason: it is stolen property!

https://twitter.com/Warlock_Shabby/status/1751248180761752044

Originally posted by: Manavi_kesari

Looters the pseudo victims are villains .

Satyameva jayate!

Jai shree Ram🙏

Originally posted by: Manavi_kesari

https://twitter.com/shefvaidya/status/1751093547091042629?s=46&t=p-z2dOB03vGwOQeuxPg3yQ