Vanshaj {EDT #41} Rishton ki Mahabharat - Page 73

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

That's what I want to say, he is definitely among the most important characters but he isn't the one who would get a centerstage because story is of Yuvika and her fight with DJ & gang

People expect more from him so are getting disappointed

Also that mysterious aura actually led to nothing

That's just me..I guess.

Even I don't want them to sideline YUVIKA & her journey..That is the storyline of VANSHAJ..I knew what I was in for when I started watching it...

But as I said Krishna was important in Mahabharat so centre stage na sahi but Neil should get his due importance...

Originally posted by: rbpll

I never believed that he was one of the lead, but he is one of the key characters. In fact, I think he is between the lead and the key character. I don't know what we call that.

But the thing is that they didn't utilise him properly in the core plot yet. In fact, individually kuch kiya nai uske characters ka thnag se. Now with Neivika romance, neil is getting ss consistently in every episode. Otherwise, anything related to him is shown in the span of 1-2 weeks.

He will be shown regularly now I think

He is going to be the main support of Yuvika post this VH equivalent (whatever is planned )

But individually I still don't think kuchh khas dikhaayenge except that he becomes a successful businessman and can help Yuvika

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

In Mahabharata Krishna was always an important yet secondary character, he wasn't the lead but main support of leads, his individual story was of hardly any importance in MB, and was always ignored. His story was covered separately in other books but not in MB

Won't comment on Shakuni since TV shows made him an important character though he was much a very secondary less important character.

There can obviously be multiple leads but here Neil isn't, he will be the guiding force of lead but I doubt he will be ever given center stage

I guess it's just my immense love for the way these characters were portrayed in the SP Mahabharat that they have taken a center stage for me. Especially SRJ as Krishna was very convincing. And since that's the only way I was introduced to Mahabharat, I'd not comment much.

But about Neil to I personally still believe he's the Male Lead.

A lot of ITV is like this when it comes to ML. They don't treat the males very well, the story is female centric always. And undoubtedly this is Yuvika's story too. But somehow I cannot accept the idea of Neil being a supporting character and not the Male lead. I guess I just love him a lot.

But yes I respect your opinion and I understand what you're trying to say.

Originally posted by: rbpll

That mystery was in a 1st-2nd month of show ....now he is no more mysterious but yes a prominent character in the show. Since the show is from Yuvika's POV, they wrap neil's backstory in 2 episodes during vidur's arrest. Uske baad kuch nai mila

They literally had a scene where YUVIKA asked him," Who are you?" & Neil in a typical Krishna manner said," You find out yourself". So there was a mystery.

But then....well we all saw what happened!

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Rehna usko akele hi chahiye but show is progressing the way she will go to Arjun

Queen Bhoomi, it's high time kuch bhi karo bas neivika ke shaadi karadoaur Simone ko Arjun ke life se bahar feko

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

He will be shown regularly now I think

He is going to be the main support of Yuvika post this VH equivalent (whatever is planned )

But individually I still don't think kuchh khas dikhaayenge except that he becomes a successful businessman and can help Yuvika

And in the VH track Neil's character will be the most important one as Yuvika( Nagars , db too) is fearing that maybe DJ has some plans , but they are thinking they can easily handle it but only Neil understands that this plan of Dj will be dangerous for Yuvika

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

That's why I said her love was unconditional earlier..

Only thing that made her happy was to be there for DJ when he needs her. She didn't expect anything in return from him, not even his presence

Now it's different she wants a status in lieu of her love

In love you want the best for the other person even at the cost of your relationship with the other person,right?

I find your perspective really interesting! So I am curious..

Originally posted by: asmitamohanty

Again I am confused...If she still held on to DJ inspite of knowing that it is doing only harm to him in a long run...then how was her love selfless?

In love you want the best for the other person even at the cost of your relationship with the other person,right?

I find your perspective really interesting! So I am curious..

See you are confusing between two parts.

Being selfless doesn't always mean being right

A selfless or unconditional love is when you love your partner without any expectations and without a thought whether or not that acts are right, whether or not these will harm/benefit you in future.

She was never letting anything to harm him in future, she excused herself when confronted by Ruhi, never reached out to him in presence of others, ignored all the humiliation levied onto her. No where her acts could have harmed DJ in any way.

She had reduced herself into a hidden mistress but just supporting DJ. Because we all know she was the only one with whom DJ could be himself..

Everyone else in his life even his mother had burdened him with loads of expectations. Had there not been a place where he could just be for being DJ, he might have been shattered, that's where Simone was making him hold up..

In any case an EMA has no justification, but that doesn't mean that the love of people in EMA becomes selfish.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

See you are confusing between two parts.

Being selfless doesn't always mean being right

A selfless or unconditional love is when you love your partner without any expectations and without a thought whether or not that acts are right, whether or not these will harm/benefit you in future.

She was never letting anything to harm him in future, she excused herself when confronted by Ruhi, never reached out to him in presence of others, ignored all the humiliation levied onto her. No where her acts could have harmed DJ in any way.

She had reduced herself into a hidden mistress but just supporting DJ. Because we all know she was the only one with whom DJ could be himself..

Everyone else in his life even his mother had burdened him with loads of expectations. Had there not been a place where he could just be for being DJ, he might have been shattered, that's where Simone was making him hold up..

In any case an EMA has no justification, but that doesn't mean that the love of people in EMA becomes selfish.

Though I still don't agree that Simone's love is selfless...

Human emotions are complicated! Relationship can be really messy for some people, so you can judge actions but you can nevere judge love..

Did I get you right?