Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism
They did say. when they were discussing about Mahajan 75th anniversary, it was SP who had started the company, and used to work as a workshop guy in their watch unit, everything related to Mahajan empire would be under his self acquired property. In fact had it been family property, all three brothers would have got equal share irrespective of any "will" by SP.
The mere fact that SP was able to do unequal distribution means he was the one with complete rights over the property distribution.
That is exactly what I am saying, the moment "will" comes in picture it is entirely the decision of owner on how property will be divided, other laws won't supersede in such cases. Here he could have very well added Subhadra's name (if at all he cared), yes she wouldn't have got anything if there were a partition suit since she was before the right to females in father's property.
I guess I missed that Bhasan on SPM's life.
Good for me 
This is unbelievable!
He made an empire freaking empire, 4 kids from different women all in one lifetime? 
Unbelievable matlab KUCH BHI? 
But even in self acquired property tab tho woh tradition bhi nehi tha na ish liye I am not surprised about Subhadra not getting share. Family property hoti tab bhi nehi milta Subhadra ko that time.
Considering the ERA of SPM, SPM wasn't bound in ANY way neither legally nor as a matter of the then stereotypical chalan to give anything to Subhadra! That time tho koi soochta tak nehi tha about giving property rights to daughters! That's where the issue of Beta Ghar Ka Chirag lied.
All their responsibilities towards a daughter was limited to Marriage and Streedhan.
SPM konsa dev manush tha jo Subhadra ka soochta 
However in current amendment of Succession Act there are provisions for self acquired property too. The codification is actually very tight and covers a large area 
But it took ages to reach here nehi? 
53