Feminism gaya tel lene - Page 28

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Because it is his constitutional right to make a movie he wants to make, I don't support boycott or ban of any art form also I didn't say what people should watch or enjoy, their life their choice.

Collection and movie are different things. People celebrating collections aren't sexist or misogynistic, people celebrating those scenes are, I am not gonna put both in the same bracket.

These just don't match. You gotta pick a lane. It's either the first or the second.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

It's not about creative license. It's freedom of speech. Even the most despicable speech should be allowed unless it's actually calling for criminal action.

Solution is not to watch it. Not to celebrate it. Not to celebrate collections or acting or anything in it.

At least you're clear about your stance even if it's impractical.

Originally posted by: ohophelia

These just don't match. You gotta pick a lane. It's either the first or the second.

Which first or second considering you edited a huge part of my post? And what you have kept doesn't fit in first or second category

Vanga has the right to make any movie he wants. Ranbir has the right to star in any movie. Then why is the audience getting a lecture? The audience is watching the end product. It is far more practical to question the director and actor instead of the millions of people that will be watching this movie.

Of course, the character was written to be hated and not celebrated. Sure.

Originally posted by: Haila_tu

Kitna royenge log....it's just a movie!!!

Wonder what would happen to these people if they ever watched an A rated Disturbing Korean film.

Well Kabir Singh came 1500 or 1600 days ago and people still have issues with that. I for see lasting long

Originally posted by: Petrichor80

Vanga has the right to make any movie he wants. Ranbir has the right to star in any movie. Then why is the audience getting a lecture? The audience is watching the end product. It is far more practical to question the director and actor instead of the millions of people that will be watching this movie.

I shouldve directed the movie

Originally posted by: Petrichor80

Vanga has the right to make any movie he wants. Ranbir has the right to star in any movie. Then why is the audience getting a lecture? The audience is watching the end product. It is far more practical to question the director and actor instead of the millions of people that will be watching this movie.

Audience can watch any movie they want to watch, who is stopping them? It is your constitutional right to go to a theater and watch a movie. None here can stop you or anyone else

Originally posted by: Petrichor80

Vanga has the right to make any movie he wants. Ranbir has the right to star in any movie. Then why is the audience getting a lecture? The audience is watching the end product. It is far more practical to question the director and actor instead of the millions of people that will be watching this movie.

Wahi toh. They'll blame women watching the movie because they're not real feminists. They'll advocate for celebrating collections which is basically Venga and Co filling their pockets from the exact movie which they again want the audience to denounce for it's content which again is impossible because the movie is literally begging you to celebrate the hero. The average audience must jump through so many loopholes here.

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Which first or second considering you edited a huge part of my post? And what you have kept doesn't fit in first or second category

It's clear. You're choosing not to see.