Dimpy is carrying samars only child akhri nishani
if dimpy marry again child will belong to dimpy and titu not vanraj and baa thats why they object
if a man dies and his only child with his wife usually in india or asia they will not easily allow to marry as that child is only child of their son akhri nishani. So they want child to live with fathers family only all life. If mother marries child will go with mother to second hubby house and consider 2nd hubby as his father and their family as fathers house.
But than the child can get samar as father in official documents and his sur name need not get titu name if they are woorried about child losing fathers identity
i am sure if anupama was vanraj widow and wanted to marry anuj, baa would not accept that too even if vanraj cheated on her with kavya
thats how patriarchal society thinks - a man can marry within a month of wife death, but wife cannot think of marrying anyone after 6 month or 6 years after vanraj death too as its sin
also if anuj as middle class or not so rich no way baa or vanraj would allow her to marry anuj kapadiya. Neither would bapuj encourage her saying hes your kanhaiya etc they would object vehemently
here titu is not so rich as anuj, if he was as rich as anuj baa bapuji vanraj would stand on one toe to marry them both for gains because titu wealth would go to samar kid
Edited by myviewprem - 1 years ago