LMAO So much for Niti being lied to everyone... - Page 4

Originally posted by: riabhay204

That and everyone thinking she's the only victim in this whole thing. Like as if she hasn't stooped to the lowest of the lows. Tried to kill not only her "Jaan" but her own baby as well. Like if she really wanted to she could've asked Pari the truth, but no she went beyond low. Whatever happened to her is unfortunate but to go plan countless murders and have Pari marry a guy that Rakesh that's ridiculous. If she's so smart and modern, why doesn't she see bebe's plan and vile intentions. Why can't she see through her? Also if Neeti is so damn smart why couldn't she put two and two together on how the whole Bajwa zoo love Pari or knew about Pari before they even got to know pari? Like no one can be this low and dumb like be fr.

I genuinely believe Neetii can just have Sanju/Rajiv whoever he wants to be, and have Pari move on from this Bajwa zoo and a bandar like Rajiv and truly find a guy and in-laws who will stand up for her and value her.

This show has made a joke out of hindu marriages. Pari is unfortunately his one and only true wife. Neetii doesn't even know the dude's real name, nor about his family before accepting his wedding proposal like are you serious?

Pari is an idiot for even taking all the family's and Neeti's bs like just expose them or just tell Neetii and Gurvinder off and leave from there. If Neetii wants the trash let her have it and find yourself better people to surround you. She can literally throw Gurvindar and Rajiv in jail for fraud but no her dumb*** is protecting them for what? Especially Gurvinder, like she has been acting way above her aukaat.

Except Pari herself is culpable of at least two rather serious crimes. She willingly knowing she is the first and legal wife agreed for her husband and in laws to fraudulently marry another woman, without the woman's consent to plural marriage. Her second crime is her hand in the sexual coercion, which can be termed as rape of Neeti, since rape is lack of full consent. Her actions in having full knowledge of these crimes and her full participation is, in fact, criminal. There are laws in India against anyone, here first wives, allowing second wives to be entrapped in bigamy.

So Pari ain't going nowhere. She cam take her place next to Rajiv, the whole Bajwaj zoo and yes, Niti, who has engaged in attempted crimes. Keep in mind, Niti will be able to pleaad emotional abuse that led her to commit crimes. A prior record of not having committed crimes would show her actions as situational.

And frankly, your tone is very dangerous. You are blaming the victim. NO. Neeeti should not know the first wife, his family and husband are engaging in bigamy. At the very least, Pari should have stopped it before it started.

So let's add criminal to Pari's attributes.

Originally posted by: kiransgirl

Except Pari herself is culpable of at least two rather serious crimes. She willingly knowing she is the first and legal wife agreed for her husband and in laws to fraudulently marry another woman, without the woman's consent to plural marriage. Her second crime is her hand in the sexual coercion, which can be termed as rape of Neeti, since rape is lack of full consent. Her actions in having full knowledge of these crimes and her full participation is, in fact, criminal. There are laws in India against anyone, here first wives, allowing second wives to be entrapped in bigamy.

So Pari ain't going nowhere. She cam take her place next to Rajiv, the whole Bajwaj zoo and yes, Niti, who has engaged in attempted crimes. Keep in mind, Niti will be able to pleaad emotional abuse that led her to commit crimes. A prior record of not having committed crimes would show her actions as situational.

And frankly, your tone is very dangerous. You are blaming the victim. NO. Neeeti should not know the first wife, his family and husband are engaging in bigamy. At the very least, Pari should have stopped it before it started.

So let's add criminal to Pari's attributes.

In any country whether your crime is situational or not is irrelevant. A lighter sentence may be given but in the eyes of the law a crime is a crime.

Pari should have left the house and told Neeti the truth. That’s completely on her but ultimately it’s Sanju and mommy dearest that should pay the highest price.

For the sake of the story we have the two dumbest women to ever grace a show and a male lead that a lot of people hate. There’s no high moral ground on any of this. It’s all a train wreck

Originally posted by: Lipstickqueen

unless they changed the story, the bolded part is not true. She didn’t know Rajeev/Sanju/moron was married to two women for a very longtime. She put it together and confronted him. The family , other than his enabling mom had no clue he had two wives hence Pami was out for blood.

In any country whether your crime is situational or not is irrelevant. A lighter sentence may be given but in the eyes of the law a crime is a crime.

Pari should have left the house and told Neeti the truth. That’s completely on her but ultimately it’s Sanju and mommy dearest that should pay the highest price.

For the sake of the story we have the two dumbest women to ever grace a show and a male lead that a lot of people hate. There’s no high moral ground on any of this. It’s all a train wreck

Ignorance of the law is not an excuse to get away with breaking it. I am a recent viewer of this $hitshow. However, even if Pari found out later that her husband is a bigamist, by remaining silent and continuing the crime, she is, in fact, still guilty of that crime. The moment she knew her legally wed husband had a second wife and that wife was not aware and she remained quiet, she became an accessory to that crime.

The problem with this story is the glamorization and PROMOTION of bigamy, as if it doesn't have serious consequences. That such garbage is allowed to play out on national tv is testimony of India's continued regressiveness. It's one thing to hate Neeti, it's another to make a bigamist a hero and the wife who KNOWS as the heroine. It's also unacceptable to present bigamy as if it is innocuous.

Originally posted by: kiransgirl

Ignorance of the law is not an excuse to get away with breaking it. I am a recent viewer of this $hitshow. However, even if Pari found out later that her husband is a bigamist, by remaining silent and continuing the crime, she is, in fact, still guilty of that crime. The moment she knew her legally wed husband had a second wife and that wife was not aware and she remained quiet, she became an accessory to that crime.

The problem with this story is the glamorization and PROMOTION of bigamy, as if it doesn't have serious consequences. That such garbage is allowed to play out on national tv is testimony of India's continued regressiveness. It's one thing to hate Neeti, it's another to make a bigamist a hero and the wife who KNOWS as the heroine. It's also unacceptable to present bigamy as if it is innocuous.

You are absolutely right on your above statement; nothing to argue there