Bollywood, there is a diff between nepotism and access. - Page 15

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

I never got my own personal opinion involved anything if you can go back and read.

Wait you’re arguing with me over a movie for other people ?

Why ? Why can’t it be left alone if I say “nuts to those people”

I use IMDb now and then. Not really for reviews. Why is that such the issue ?

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

You didn’t like my thoughts on Gunjan

Then tried to show me strangers opinions on the movie so I might change what I feel ?

Much better plan right ?

Nope my point was that Jhanvi got Gunjan, a title role, on a platter as her second film. Vicky worked his way to get Udham Singh. I never cared to change your opinion. I just said the consensus was that Vicky performed in the title role much better. That was both public consensus. And because you are the one who gives more merit to award functions they gave him more awards too. By every measure he utilized the oppurtunity better besides your public opinion.

And yes, I am still at least making points about films. Instead of getting personal with others. And doing a great job displaying my personal insecurities. 😆

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Wait you’re arguing with me over a movie for other people ?

Why ? Why can’t it be left alone if I say “nuts to those people”

I use IMDb now and then. Not really for reviews. Why is that such the issue ?

Once again this conversation started off about merit, nepotism and access. If you are going to go about your own opinion about talentless nepo actors and never bother what the consensus is about them. Or what people who run acting schools or have film making degrees actually feel. Then there is no way to make any point here. You can just say I feel Nawaz Siddiqui or Manoj Bajpai and a talentless wooden plank like Jhanvi and Ananya are equal in terms of merit. Who cares about what the rest of the world feels? How is anything going to get proven about those who made it on merit versus those who made it on nepotism? Yes, access was there. But there are many famous sons of actors and directors who do not make it.

And my point was that one opinion does not prove anything about a film. There has to be a consensus that film was good. Or else I can think Ananya was brilliant in liger. Therefore no need to debate merit and nepotism.??

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Learn to read a list

The consensus is wrong. 100 % they know nothing. Especially if your their advocate 😆 Talking about Agneepath was a flop when it had an all Time opening day. An if your excuse is you looked up the 1990 one well that really says it all on your research 🧐

And i know people with filmfare degrees, who run acting schools, who run the top talent agencies that agree. Once again one agneepanth was still a flop. That is at least a far more accurate statement then Ananya has more hits then misses. That says it all on your research.

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Learn to read a list

The consensus is wrong. 100 % they know nothing. Especially if your their advocate 😆 Talking about Agneepath was a flop when it had an all Time opening day. An if your excuse is you looked up the 1990 one well that really says it all on your research 🧐

Yes then consensus is wrong. Because your solo opinion is the truth carved in stone. When your research also shows you dont know how to read a list either. Again my point about the list was still far more accurate then yours about Ananya Panday's filmography.

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

Who cares about what the rest of the world feels?

I was right about Kangana ( even you gotta admit that)

The rest of world should’ve listed to me on that.

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

I really don’t as a lot of things I say end up being right anyway.

I was right about Kangana ( even you gotta admit that)

The rest of world should’ve listed to me on that.

Arguing about who should be win and they end up winning is not being proven right. Especially since most people don't give merit to award function. I never have and was already very skeptical about whether Vicky would win but that would require to much reading comprehension from you.

Most the things you say end up true. Why hasnt Jhanvi managed to get any major acting award after her debut? Why has she only given disasters in theatres and controversial movie releases on OTT afterwards.

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

that doesn’t make a difference to me.

I’m not even sure still if you can read a list

What does that matter when clearly you cant either!

Speaking of always being right. You also thought Driven's prediction was not that far off. And if you finally fixed your reading comprehension he was actually making a prediction. Not arguing about what ideally should happen. You still can't seem to understand the difference.

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/bollywood/5316438/my-box-office-prediction-for-kisi-ka-bhai-kisi-ki-jaan

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

I never have and was already very skeptical about whether Vicky would win but that would require to much reading comprehension from you.

Perhaps you need a tutorial on Bollywood and lists