Pakistani actress Mahnoor Baloch feels that SRK is not handsome - Page 5

Originally posted by: Mai.NePyarKiya

dilip was himself over actor and monotonous

LOlx

Where have u been. Long time no see here..

Originally posted by: Witcher

To be honest I always found him incredibly handsome.

Originally posted by: atominis

She is right.

SRK is neither handsome nor a good or versatile actor.

He is the MOST overhyped actor in history of Asian cinema.

And one of most overhyped actors in the world.

He indeed knows how to market himself well.

His films have no substance and are same old superficial fluff.

SRK was, is and will always be the biggest STAR in the history of BW

Originally posted by: Arsalan_khan

after watching Anjaam i almost forgot every film of srk ....such brillant acting he did in negative role ...having typedcast is not his fault he has proved himself when got different films

Neither do I. In fact I used to find him yikes during his hay days and now he's just cringe fest.

Mahnoor Baloch said, “It is my opinion about Shah Rukh Khan that he doesn’t know acting. He is a great businessman, he knows how to market himself. Maybe, his fans and people would disagree with me, and that’s okay. He has a good personality, he markets himself well. There are so many good actors, who are not as successful.”

Source: SRK is a bad actor,doesn't know acting

She is spot on. Absolutely agree with her.

fine for you, but why exactly a second thread about the same...quite superficial opinion... to gain attention...

Originally posted by: atominis

I am not saying SRK cannot act at all but he is a fairly one type actor and weak. Not exactly a thespian or layered or hard working actor say in league of Dilip Kumar or AB Sr who worked on everything from voice modulation to expressions, posture, body language etc.

He took his stardom for granted and ran entire career on smile or dimples and outstretched arms in romantic films.

One Pathaan or CDI cannot hide fact that he has primarily been a lover boy type hero. No one romances like him. But he hardly did much in other genres. His capacity as an actor is fairly limited.

He is surely a better actor than Salman but standard should not be so low that one feels they are better just by comparing to Salman who is all looks and no acting.

bold : You have no idea, atominis...that was (and still is) something SRK even did as a new actor in television...his scripts are full of notes...he even writes little stories about the characters' possible lives...creates certain traits unique to a certain character...he works on everything you mention above.

I cannot say anything about the "hard work" relative to AB or Dilip Saab, but I definitely can say that you are very wrong about SRK.

red : what exactly do you mean with "one type actor and weak"? define that, please... because you are also wrong with

blue : just look at his filmography...you may often read the genre romance but you will find many several other genres, because drama, comedy, thriller, mystery, crime, fantasy, action, coming-of-age, parody, satire, period, historical, superhero and sports (even when combined) are different genres!

Originally posted by: Clochette

fine for you, but why exactly a second thread about the same...quite superficial opinion... to gain attention...