Pervert Bollywood - Page 24

Does loyalty not count as being a family man? I thought loyalty, fidelity was paramount atleast in Indian context especially after polygamy was outlawed in India.

Merely providing meals and money for family and not being around for wife, kids or not being loyal was okay?

Weren't people of past more orthodox and conservative and judged character and looked down upon even ones who went to a kotha and called it 'shauq of bigdey shehzaade'?

I am aware though, that kings, nobles had multiple wives, slave girls, at times, even slave boys, saw mujra, slept around, had concubines, visited kothas, funded tawaifs.

Guess I am judging them from a more middle class understanding of notions of family, age appropriate behaviour or character then. Because I have never seen anyone as judgemental about character or sanskar or values as older generation people and I have seen the people from those times rave about how great those times were and what values they had then.

This is why I wondered, is this the values they had?

I mean look at age of SD Burman here and his toothless smile is a second hand embarrassment. Reminds me of Shaukeen movie.

I just wonder why older lot always pretend they had better culture, values, character then and look down upon new era or act all preachy and moralistic.

I do agree many men are protective and possessive of women in own family while they themselves do anything they like. I am aware these Bollywood guys and others knew what they themselves did to women and what industry was like, which is why they banned women from studios and sets or did not allow women of own family to work in films or interact with filmi colleagues or other men fron industry. The double standards on character and attitude towards women irk me. I mean one is being protective of woman in own family or how others view her but one is okay with doing anything with other women, who may also be someone else's daughter, wife, sister or granddaughter, niece, mom etc?

I am aware this hypocrisy exists till date. I just called it out for what it is. It is not a good thing. It is bad no matter how one spins it.

I can totally imagine Bhoi at such parties at his farmhouse at his age and giving a toothless smile at sight of semi clad dancers.

Sorry for Athiya 😐

https://www.reddit.com/r/BollyBlindsNGossip/comments/13shcw4/kl_rahul_seen_at_london_strip_club/

https://twitter.com/balltamperrer/status/1662131001089474561?t=P6hRkMh-cG2LCwt6-cKV3g&s=19

https://twitter.com/GemsOfCricket/status/1662135942218670080?t=XeAgTyjZLhzUSm213CrD_Q&s=19

Originally posted by: atominis

Does loyalty not count as being a family man? I thought loyalty, fidelity was paramount atleast in Indian context especially after polygamy was outlawed in India.

Merely providing meals and money for family and not being around for wife, kids or not being loyal was okay?

Weren't people of past more orthodox and conservative and judged character and looked down upon even ones who went to a kotha and called it 'shauq of bigdey shehzaade'?

I am aware though, that kings, nobles had multiple wives, slave girls, at times, even slave boys, saw mujra, slept around, had concubines, visited kothas, funded tawaifs.

Guess I am judging them from a more middle class understanding of notions of family, age appropriate behaviour or character then. Because I have never seen anyone as judgemental about character or sanskar or values as older generation people and I have seen the people from those times rave about how great those times were and what values they had then.

This is why I wondered, is this the values they had?

I mean look at age of SD Burman here and his toothless smile is a second hand embarrassment. Reminds me of Shaukeen movie.

I just wonder why older lot always pretend they had better culture, values, character then and look down upon new era or act all preachy and moralistic.

I do agree many men are protective and possessive of women in own family while they themselves do anything they like. I am aware these Bollywood guys and others knew what they themselves did to women and what industry was like, which is why they banned women from studios and sets or did not allow women of own family to work in films or interact with filmi colleagues or other men fron industry. The double standards on character and attitude towards women irk me. I mean one is being protective of woman in own family or how others view her but one is okay with doing anything with other women, who may also be someone else's daughter, wife, sister or granddaughter, niece, mom etc?

I am aware this hypocrisy exists till date. I just called it out for what it is. It is not a good thing. It is bad no matter how one spins it.

i think this is very confused thinking. And here's just ONE example out of the numerous from your essay-

you talked about older lot thinking they had better culture and values back then. But you need to first define who it is you are referring to- the upper strata, the middle and lower classes? The thing is all classes today are probably less conservative today than they were in the past. Sex is prevalent among all strata, as are live-ins and different forms of sexuality. Back then, I think it was generally only the upper strata. The middle and lower strata had their hands full just trying to just meals on the table... So it would be right for them to think they had those traditional values, because many did. Not the case today.

Basically, your confusion stems from taking a narrow slice of society from the past and extrapolating from that to everyone. Flawed stuff that stems from not thinking thru things analytically, if I may say so😉

Kangana already told that debauchery exists in Bollywood.

There is a whole lot of oldies acting holier than thou and thekedaar of kalchar among judges, politicians, some senior movie stars too.

They deserve to be called out for their hypocrisy.

Whenever they whine about aaj kal ke bache or today's generation or glorify old times as humare time mein yeh woh golden era, they need to be reminded of these acts and shown these pics.

That is all.

KL Rahul has given sexist statements in interviews too.

Nothing surprising.

Athiya knows who she married.

Papa's princess married a cricketer for money and riches.

Trophy wife.

I do not feel sorry for these poor little rich girls. They are okay with it. They probably learnt to live with it and grew up seeing moms tolerating dads too. Sunil recently spoke how he would return home at 4AM and Mana would never complain. LMAO! I guess Mana Shetty had no guts to complain nor ask if he was away for shooting or something else.

These women also enjoy the money and status without bothering about respect or loyalty or fidelity.

Originally posted by: atominis

There is a whole lot of oldies acting holier than thou and thekedaar of kalchar among judges, politicians, some senior movie stars too.

They deserve to be called out for their hypocrisy.

Whenever they whine about aaj kal ke bache or today's generation or glorify old times as humare time mein yeh woh golden era, they need to be reminded of these acts and shown these pics.

That is all.

tell me about them.😆 Thankfully I've not known many of these types in my circle, even though I've not always been a sanskari boy.😊