Originally posted by: Priyrabha
No depth? Really? He is an orphan. He live all his life without anyone. He had no one to show his emotions. What u want to add in his ckt? Orphan hona khud main ek struggle hai. He is either not a confusing ckt. We know very well what he want, what he love. No I never get confused.
What ur obsession if he called himself AA? He is AA. First he was assuring AK that she will safe with him & She was. Now Abhi directly said "aap itne bhi ache insan nahi hai" that man literally degrading him so he just said what he did for his beta as not being an AA.
I don't think you understand my point, and made a whole other post for your point as well. Abhinav is a surface-level character, his struggles were never explored, his reasons were never explored, and he is just doing everything because he is a good person/ wants a family. Character depth doesn't come just cause they say he is an orphan. A well-developed character is one where you know what they went through and how they learned from it or even how they were traumatized by it. A character with depth does not equate to a person with depth of character. I simply mean he is not well-developed, and he is hard to connect with. The reason for all this debate and discussion is cause whatever happened in those seven months, people literally can't understand. It's the writer's fault, I am not blaming anyone else. And yes, introducing a character as AA and having that be his only identity, especially when you want him to play as a lead, is hard to digest.
But on a side note, why is every post that is made about a character taken so personally? I am not obsessed with anything, I understand that being an orphan is hard, and he had a hard life, but we know nothing about this life. And yes, it is confusing when a character's motivations aren't clear. If you say his motivation is that he is a good person, then congrats, you are in the same boat as the writers. With Ak, Abhi even Arohi, to a large extent, things are way more developed, partially cause they started earlier, but more importantly, cause they are all connected by emotional trauma and bonds.
I have no issues with Nav post-leap because, yes, he loves his family, and if he does anything to protect this family or keep them, I will not have any issues. But we are still discussing pre-leap when he helped Ak. This is another reason I said he should have referred to how he took care of Abhir as a father to prove he is his father than what he did when he was just a friend to Ak. He can talk about raising Abhir, being there for him, for Ak, everything. But he keeps talking about his big AA move of helping a pregnant woman who he didn't know. A move I do not understand.
Anupamaa
Current Affairs
Sports
Bade Achhe Lagte Hain
4