Originally posted by: SAOkr
1st red one
yes it was without consent but fact is ak loved him and was happy to marry him , so for some women it may be violation of personal space but for some its about asking whether you love them back or not.
and as far as leaving aarohi at altar is concerned she knew he didnt love her then why she agreed to marry him . so we can blame abhi but aarohi cant . because they were both in it for their own selfish needs.
2nd blue
why wouldnt he implicate when all proofs were against him, also when kairav himself ran away with ak for 1 year what do you expect. yes ak was away from family for one year and given her voice (for one year) whose benefit she can easily claim if she had filed a case. ]
but abhi too faced a society for one year, as a man whose wife had run away , as a man who loved the girl whose brother killed his sister(atleast for 1 year ) for that perioud of time everyone taunted him for that too , so even after coming back and without proofs still trying to boss him around what would you expect of him other than to implicate the accused.
3rd divorce .
he is getting the karma for this one at present so it neednt be explained.
4th kick her out.
first of all he hadnt kicked her out he asked her to leave.
second "empathy" . when he cared for her , then how many times she went ahead and risked her life along with her babies and neil, there is a limit for caring about someone .if he or she doesnt value your care o love and keep on doing things that hurt you then the love or care will diminish with time. ak who cant even care for her own life much less babies and neil , at that time if you ask me abhi was tired for caring for someone who doesnt value her own life, her babies life.
"since yo consider abhi has done all these vile acts and still expect him to respect AAbhinav even when he was decieving Abhi . then i would say same people have wrong expectations."
10