Originally posted by: atominis
Very very well reasoned, well argued post and well thought out arguments.
It makes sense.
His films are indeed unique and larger than life. Transport you to another world and characters are powerful. I mean Bahubali has each character so headstrong and well fleshed out.
Eega was totally unique concept too.
I have not watched RRR yet but I am surprised at its popularity.
I do agree his films are different from usual chiffon sarees and dance in Swiss Alps that Bollywood has to offer. And they are also not as preachy as say, typical Aamir films.
He seems to have managed to entertain audience and send them to world of fantasy and made that fantasy believable.
I think a certain old world charm in his films works better for him compared to more futuristic S. Shankar. Those kingdoms, kings, queens or period drama elements and themes inspired from Mahabharat or Ramayan, or folk lore, make his films more enticing.
I agree about his stars too. NTR Jr and Ram Charan have behaved very classy, decent and not wannabe at all unlike Ash, Anil, PC when they went abroad. And no attempts to sound pseudo intellectual or flaunt so called wit. NTR Jr put up an accent but it was not as fake as Anil or PC. The humility and disciplined demeanour are attractive.
@ Bold: I have a theory around that too. I'm Canadian. I have no Indian accent. But Americans have trouble understanding us as well at times because we don't have that drawling accent. I feel like a heavy Indian accent would have gone over their heads. So NTR Jr and Ram Charan adapted their tone to something that they felt Americans would understand better.
I do feel that they were different than Anil or PC or DP. Anil I still kinda understand. He got a chance to appear in a British film. He adapted. But PC and DP became wannabes. They literally wanted to sound like that's where they were born and raised. And an accent is not enough to do that.
11