Iss type of eve-teasing ko kya naam doon? - Page 4

Originally posted by: WhtsinAname

Dt was eve teasing ?? Oh sorry Adam teasing😆

It felt more like sarcasms .

But to be on the topic .....if Stan was feeling uncomfortable.......why didnt he say so ?? Neither to them nor behind their backs to Sajid (like he did wid Shaleen).

First thing abt stopping harrassment is opposing it or showing ur displeasure .

PS : Funny how Sajid cant be callled what he actually is but this is an issue.

I called for justice,how dare we😭

KD - 😒

I come to forum for entertainment and you….hmm🧐 you have to knit pick and spoil the fun. Making me feel guilty. 😆 😆
TRP Queen Archana 😭 was just having fun. 😒

Stop moral policing the issue

Originally posted by: WhtsinAname

Dt was eve teasing ?? Oh sorry Adam teasing😆

It felt more like sarcasms .

But to be on the topic .....if Stan was feeling uncomfortable.......why didnt he say so ?? Neither to them nor behind their backs to Sajid (like he did wid Shaleen).

First thing abt stopping harrassment is opposing it or showing ur displeasure .

PS : Funny how Sajid cant be callled what he actually is but this is an issue.

Lol …. Did you study law from the same school as Nimrit ( Disclaimer-it’s humour, just take it in that spirit)

On the Issue…..You have absolved the 2 lecherous predators @Archana & Priyanka who were making lewd comments & gestures instead blaming the poor victim Stan instead (for his inaction)….. kahan gaya woh #MeToo andolan spirit ?…,, woh badlao ka junoon ?🤨

The comments for the show on the forums will be for contestant’s behaviour INSIDE the house …. Sajid is #MeToo ACCUSED & ALLEGATIONS are for his behaviour OUTSIDE the house ….. But these 2 MAHAAN matas behaviour is right in front of your eyes INSIDE the house IN the show …. and you are sweeping the issue under the carpet

Side Note - Welcome Sha or should I say Zu ( both Tina’s favs)…. Good to see another old chawal alive & kicking…. Is Rukhi here too ?….. Comments on the topic later

Haya is the adornment of a person, if you don't have it then do as you please, but it speaks plenty of your character and people will avoid you and should

Exactly. Totally unacceptable but can't expect anything else from archana. I don't think she is that aware.

Sadist pleasure to their eyes. Have you seen Ankit's built in college task? I think Priyanks is jealous of the boys like Shiv/Shalin cause they have good body. Poorr Stan got humiliated and laughed off at his body cause these witches think they are Sundaris/ Apsaras from some divine world and black, thin Stan is some object to them for body shaming.

Originally posted by: MadOwhat

Lol …. Did you study law from the same school as Nimrit ( Disclaimer-it’s humour, just take it in that spirit)

On the Issue…..You have absolved the 2 sexual predators @Archana & Priyanka and blaming the poor victim Stan instead (for his inaction)….. kahan gaya woh #MeToo andolan spirit ?…,, woh badlao ka junoon ?🤨

The comments for the show on the forums will be for contestant’s behaviour INSIDE the house …. Sajid is #MeToo ACCUSED & ALLEGATIONS are for his behaviour OUTSIDE the house ….. But these 2 MAHAAN matas behaviour is right in front of your eyes INSIDE the house IN the show …. and you are sweeping the issue under the carpet

Side Note - Welcome Sha or should I say Zu ( both Tina’s favs)…. Good to see another old chawal alive & kicking…. Is Rukhi here too ?….. Comments on the topic later

Lol

As I said .....I found it more like Sarcasms. Didnt look like eve teasing to me.

Well if Stan comes forward and accuses den BB can punish the two accused as it seems fit and yahan pe you guys can crucify dem ....as wish and for dt ....Stan ka opinion bhi doesnt matter

And as for ur joke. No I am not a lawyer or study law but in my profession.....we are taught about it. Its a part of my curriculum. But I wasnt quoting law. IT WAS MY OPINION.

Wanted to add this. Personally if my frnds (guys) tease me...I dnt call it eve teasing . Frnds mein itna chalta hai. If I am comfortable wid anything...I will let dem know. Dts what I meant when I said Stan could hv been vocal abt him being uncomfortable.

Side note : I am not holding any andolan . MeToo was already a movement and I didnt start it. Also I dnt believe I live inside the BB house.....So I am not bound by its rules to not judge a person for who he or she is. Sajid is a known accussed and der are some severe allegations against him. But dts ur choice.....what u believe or not believe. I dnt force my views on anyone and would expect the same from others too.

Originally posted by: Colors_face

this forum and ddt is biased towards pri and her group

they also hailed archu when she grabbed shiv neck

when i said same in ddt , everyone attacked me saying how unbiased they are

If boys can checkout girls why can’t girls.

Originally posted by: WhtsinAname

Lol

As I said .....I found it more like Sarcasms. Didnt look like eve teasing to me.

Well if Stan comes forward and accuses den BB can punish the two accused as it seems fit and yahan pe you guys can crucify dem ....as wish and for dt ....Stan ka opinion bhi doesnt matter

And as for ur joke. No I am not a lawyer or study law but in my profession.....we are taught about it. Its a part of my curriculum. But I wasnt quoting law. IT WAS MY OPINION.

Side note : I am not holding any andolan . MeToo was already a movement and I didnt start it. Also I dnt believe I live inside the BB house.....So I am not bound by its rules to not judge a person for who he or she is. Sajid is a known accussed and der are some severe allegations against him. But dts ur choice.....what u believe or not believe. I dnt force my views on anyone and would expect the same from others too.

Sajid is accused of molestation ….. the court have yet to give a verdict …….calling him MOLESTER is not an OPINION but a CONCLUSION…..calling him “Molestation Accused” could be a fact based OPINION

@Andolan - For sure you didn’t start #MeToo …. It’s a US movement now being emulated by India ….But by raising a banner of #MeToo and calling an accused a “Molester” you become a part of it …. Nothing wrong or right about it …. As long as it’s consistent and doesn’t have a gender bias…, what is good for goose, is good for gander

I am not changing anyone’s views .I am just putting up an argument on the consistency of judgement … and I guess that’s why forums exist

As for painting the issue with the assumption brush that it is sarcasm.I would call it an attempt to sweep the issue under the carpet since it’s not fact based and not supported by evidence or any rationale … call call it “wishful thing” or “ a biased opinion ” or simply an “convenient assumption “

If you see a Woman/Man harassed by 2 individuals of opposite sex right in front of you …..would you watch it silently/ look the other way because the victim is not raising a voice?