Originally posted by: M.Wheeler
You clearly implied that Mouni was the reason for success and now you are backtracking
Otherwise I don't see any reason to post review in a thread which is clearly about audience s verdict
Brahmastra os a movie with two-star kids in lead. Directed by star kid and produced by star kids. It still performed very well on the box. That proofs that the general cinema-going audience does not care about nepotism
So that ends the nepotism debate. Simple
Yes, because Ranbir couldn't carry Shamshera. And even Alia has had flops . And no that review was a critics analysis. As you yourself said their past films did not work because they were bad films with bad concepts. Also bad performances. This film worked because of good performance in pivotal roles many agree that was Mouni. You have no proof that was her PR. Those are interviews of hers. A tv star can def afford a PR?
Alia was the lead is biggest joke I heard. Everyone agree she was the typic flowerpot with no scope to perform. You provide no evidence for your claims and keeping making bogus claims about mine.
more
I even did a pole here where most agreed Mouni outshadowed the leads. The fact that she showcased the two supposed best actors out of the nepo kids shouldn't end the nepotism debate. Rest I am going to let you live in your lala land. It is pretty clear you ad your blind fandom won't rest until you have shoved RK and Alia down everyone's throat.
https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/bollywood/5304435/mouni-outshadowed-ranbir-aloo-in-bramastra-warning-spoilers
Edited by Grumpydwarf24 - 3 years ago
32