Bramashtra success ends NEPO debate - Page 2

Originally posted by: M.Wheeler

You are really going to claim that audience went to watch brahmastra for Mouni roy? Kuch bhi 😆

If you think it was for RK? Then why didn't people go watch Shamshera for him? Why aren't the Khans film working? Name and recognition really matter in today's time. After reviews got out. Mouni was the one who made the film worth watching. Everyone agreed.

Even if they didn't the fact that Mouni stole the show in the film itself is enough reason to not end the nepotism debate.

How though? Audience has always gone and seen Alia's films. Ranbir also manages openings. That's never really been the question.

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

If you think it was for RK? Then why didn't people go watch Shamshera for him? Why aren't the Khans film working? Name and recognition really matter in today's time. After reviews got out. Mouni was the one who made the film worth watching. Everyone agreed.

What? Who's even talking about Mouni? 😆

Originally posted by: semantic.error

What? Who's even talking about Mouni? 😆

When Bramashtra discussion comes up it is all about Mouni ??

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

If you think it was for RK? Then why didn't people go watch Shamshera for him? Why aren't the Khans film working? Name and recognition really matter in today's time. After reviews got out. Mouni was the one who made the film worth watching. Everyone agreed.

The reason films are not working nowadays is because they are bad movies. Simple

They did not provide anything new. Brahmastra did. It was a fresh concept

No. Everyone did not agree that Mouni was the best part of the film. That is stretching it way too far. A few articles do not mean everyone. Mouni did well. Also has a good PR who is doing its job.

But nobody went to watch for Mouni Roy. That is such an absurd thing to say 😆

it also ends boycott debate and opens a New Bollynomics debate.

Originally posted by: M.Wheeler

The reason films are not working nowadays is because they are bad movies. Simple

They did not provide anything new. Brahmastra did. It was a fresh concept

No. Everyone did not agree that Mouni was the best part of the film. That is stretching it way too far. A few articles do not mean everyone. Mouni did well. Also has a good PR who is doing its job.

But nobody went to watch for Mouni Roy. That is such an absurd thing to say 😆

I actually never said anyone went to watch for her. I just said RK or Alia alone did not guarantee success. Really so whenever she gets good reviews for a film it is PR. Does she also have it cell on twitter? With all the people praising her. Many agreed there she was the best part of the film. There were also articles claiming Alia was a flower pot. RK did not impress much.

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

When Bramashtra discussion comes up it is all about Mouni ??

Kahan? All I see is theories that give Ayan way too much credit or the constant "Shiva, Shivaaaa, Shivaaaaaaaa"

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

When Bramashtra discussion comes up it is all about Mouni ??

No, it's not. Most of the discussion around the movie is about fan theories. Ranbir. Alia.Ayan.SRK. spin-offs. Dialogues. The love angle. etc

Originally posted by: semantic.error

Kahan? All I see is theories that give Ayan way too much credit or the constant "Shiva, Shivaaaa, Shivaaaaaaaa"

Just posted plenty of evidence about twitter among other things. Maybe you just haven't been paying attention.