Bade Achhe Lagte hain 2 EDT #29 - Page 81

Originally posted by: bhubhnis

No... I believe it's just a practical step to protect oneself. Yes it would be all rosy and romantic to start a marriage with trust... But not possible for everyone. I for one take a lot of time to trust anyone.

For me.. a prenup is just ensuring to keep financial matters separate in a marriage. Not that ill be ever in a situation to marry someone in such a little time.. not knowing anything bout them .. but if i ever was.. a prenup would make sense to me. Having that in place kind of takes away the basic mistrust that there is greed in marriage. I value my independence and would want my marriage to be never bout financial dependency.

Ram is not the one who suggested Priya sign the prenup. It was Bandini and Shubham that got the papers ready and forced Ram . Shubh am delivered the papers to Sood House if I am not mistaken. I do r think Priya had a problem worse with signing the prenup it was the way in which the papers were flung at her and her family that she objected to. She never cared what was actually in the prenup. It was her swabhiman that was hurt.

Originally posted by: bhubhnis

I didn't understand"pankha ghum raha hai" in ydays episode. Was there any reference in that... Or just P evading R as usual?

D-E-A-D

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CdF9gkpj598/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

Originally posted by: vaidharbhi95

I think she lifted in a reflex , got scared he may see it , we saw her looking at the chot immediately after that..

Otherwise it makes no sense why she would be so awkward with a mere hand touch..

But also when Ram put gel tab nahi dikha usse chot ??

I just saw the gel scene again and I found it odd Priya didn't flinch when Ram held her hand.

I'm not going to let this blooper take away the effect of the scene in the clinic 😳

I have been thinking why is this bangle being used again and again as prop. That's when I remembered the use of Handkerchief in Shakespearean Drama Othello.

Common points - Here its bangle and there in the handkerchief. Both belonged to the antagonist mother and very precious to them. Both token of love. And the best part is the story always lies in the hand of the person who holds the token of love.

Differences - Othello gives importance to the token of love ( handkerchief ) more than his love ( Desdemona) and there by destroys what could have been a beautiful married life. But here for Ram those bangles are important but not more than his love. He cares for Priya and not for the token of love.

Othello he doubts his love Desdemona as he finds the handkerchief with Cassio ( Othello's loyal captain). He doubts her having an affair with Cassio and decides to kill both Cassio and his wife. Reality is the handkerchief was planted in Cassio's room by Lago.

I am not sure if this has been the thought behind this bangle drama but whatever it is I love the fact that Ram cares for his love more than the token of love he gave Priya. There is no entrapment with token of love. When I say entrapment , I mean he doesn't believe that she needs to keep it close to her to prove her love for him. He believes in the love that she has showered on him and doesn't need any kind of proof from her. It makes him any day a better person and a great life partner.

What do you all think ??

Originally posted by: WeRockTheWorld

I have been thinking why is this bangle being used again and again as prop. That's when I remembered the use of Handkerchief in Shakespearean Drama Othello.

Common points - Here its bangle and there in the handkerchief. Both belonged to the antagonist mother and very precious to them. Both token of love. And the best part is the story always lies in the hand of the person who holds the token of love.

Differences - Othello gives importance to the token of love ( handkerchief ) more than his love ( Desdemona) and there by destroys what could have been a beautiful married life. But here for Ram those bangles are important but not more than his love. He cares for Priya and not for the token of love.

Othello he doubts his love Desdemona as he finds the handkerchief with Cassio ( Othello's loyal captain). He doubts her having an affair with Cassio and decides to kill both Cassio and his wife. Reality is the handkerchief was planted in Cassio's room by Lago.

I am not sure if this has been the thought behind this bangle drama but whatever it is I love the fact that Ram cares for his love more than the token of love he gave Priya. There is no entrapment with token of love. When I say entrapment , I mean he doesn't believe that she needs to keep it close to her to prove her love for him. He believes in the love that she has showered on him and doesn't need any kind of proof from her. It makes him any day a better person and a great life partner.

What do you all think ??

So beautifully interpreted! If this is the thought process behind what is being shown, then I'm willing to overlook the bloopers 😆

https://instagram.com/stories/manraj_sin/2829944306559700195?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igshid=MDJmNzVkMjY=

Few more Alibag scene BTS by Shubhu/ Manraj

Originally posted by: Hero_Coconut

D-E-A-D

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CdF9gkpj598/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

Originally posted by: WeRockTheWorld

I have been thinking why is this bangle being used again and again as prop. That's when I remembered the use of Handkerchief in Shakespearean Drama Othello.

Common points - Here its bangle and there in the handkerchief. Both belonged to the antagonist mother and very precious to them. Both token of love. And the best part is the story always lies in the hand of the person who holds the token of love.

Differences - Othello gives importance to the token of love ( handkerchief ) more than his love ( Desdemona) and there by destroys what could have been a beautiful married life. But here for Ram those bangles are important but not more than his love. He cares for Priya and not for the token of love.

Othello he doubts his love Desdemona as he finds the handkerchief with Cassio ( Othello's loyal captain). He doubts her having an affair with Cassio and decides to kill both Cassio and his wife. Reality is the handkerchief was planted in Cassio's room by Lago.

I am not sure if this has been the thought behind this bangle drama but whatever it is I love the fact that Ram cares for his love more than the token of love he gave Priya. There is no entrapment with token of love. When I say entrapment , I mean he doesn't believe that she needs to keep it close to her to prove her love for him. He believes in the love that she has showered on him and doesn't need any kind of proof from her. It makes him any day a better person and a great life partner.

What do you all think ??

Beautiful ..

As it is Merge Emerge, this is possible

Kangan kaand becomes more and more stupid as day goes by. Longest kaand in BALH2 universe

Originally posted by: WeRockTheWorld

I have been thinking why is this bangle being used again and again as prop. That's when I remembered the use of Handkerchief in Shakespearean Drama Othello.

Common points - Here its bangle and there in the handkerchief. Both belonged to the antagonist mother and very precious to them. Both token of love. And the best part is the story always lies in the hand of the person who holds the token of love.

Differences - Othello gives importance to the token of love ( handkerchief ) more than his love ( Desdemona) and there by destroys what could have been a beautiful married life. But here for Ram those bangles are important but not more than his love. He cares for Priya and not for the token of love.

Othello he doubts his love Desdemona as he finds the handkerchief with Cassio ( Othello's loyal captain). He doubts her having an affair with Cassio and decides to kill both Cassio and his wife. Reality is the handkerchief was planted in Cassio's room by Lago.

I am not sure if this has been the thought behind this bangle drama but whatever it is I love the fact that Ram cares for his love more than the token of love he gave Priya. There is no entrapment with token of love. When I say entrapment , I mean he doesn't believe that she needs to keep it close to her to prove her love for him. He believes in the love that she has showered on him and doesn't need any kind of proof from her. It makes him any day a better person and a great life partner.

What do you all think ??

This is soooo beautiful , love vs token of love ❤️❤️