Why SRK WHY? Disgusting if true. - Page 7

Incase of Sajid, there have always been rumours about how he sexually harassed women, his being a flirt etc was something that was relatively known long before me too even became popular, so that one is still understandable.

All of this is beyond silly anyway. Is sexual harassment the only one that counts? What about other types of physical harassment? What about people like Salman Khan who a top actress has gone on record to say he assaulted her? Are people supposed to stop working with Salman now? And by working, I mean everything - not just movies but Big Boss and Dus Ka Dum and award shows and everything. How many people in the industry are going to stop working with him?

What about Amitabh? There are actresses who have alleged harassment from him too. How many people are going to stop working with Amitabh?

I'm sorry but this is ridiculous. You can't pass on responsibility from the people actually accused to one are completely unrelated to them and are just doing a movie or a show with them. Vivek Agnihotri is the actual accused and that's why he is questioned. Nobody bothered to say why is Anupam Kher working with an accused.

But then I expect nothing but stupidity from these tit-for-tat topics anyway.

SRK is friends with a known criminal and a known piece of shit Salman Khan. Why would he care about Hirani?

I don't know why his fans act holier-than-thou. Everyone in Bollywood run behind successful people no matter how pathetic they may be. They didn't reach there because of their ethics. They reached their because they kissed ass of every powerful person out there...and that's why these celebs shouldn't be role models.

Originally posted by: Terenaina

Poor dp was super excited to do the movie with ranbir but since the director was accused of metoo, she was pressured by fans and haters to drop out of the movie and she did dropped out. Shraddha replaced her but on this forum only selective celebrities get bashed for working with accused directors. Nobody is attacking ranbir shraddha and other big name actresses and actors working with metoo accused directors and producers, why forum only targets srk, dp to not work with them but others are free to work with the alleged accused people?

I guess bigger the name, greater the responsibility. Bigger stars are always under greater limelight than small time stars then why should it be different for scrutiny?

Originally posted by: Autumn_Rose

AIB was disbanded due to false me too allegations. It’s good to have sympathy for victim but how fair is to cancel people based on allegations. Some may be true but some may not be? Is it morally or ethically right to boycott/ cancel people based on accusations.

How do people decide what is morally right or not?

Ofcourse not fair to cancel people based on accusations. However it should also apply to people other than SRK for ex. Vivek.

Originally posted by: JustWandering

It’s viveks antics like these that make people question his credibility

https://twitter.com/buttkout/status/1513748500202520578?s=21&t=6cFRNGEvxmSP8pJmvtUFZg

Making tiktoks, laughing and joking following a Pakistani meme template no less…

drag srk when he and his wife are seen mocking and celebrating profiting off blood and tears of victims…

So one is not allowed to celebrate the humongous success of their movie?

One should always roam with a straight face because their film dealt with a serious topic? Kuch bhi?

Originally posted by: Autumn_Rose

Incase of Sajid, there have always been rumours about how he sexually harassed women, his being a flirt etc was something that was relatively known long before me too even became popular, so that one is still understandable.

So going by this logic the next time someone accuses Akki of having an affair with them it would be more believable because Akki has been a known flirt. And for similar reasons if PC were to accuse SRK of inappropriate conduct during their relationship then it would be more believable because there have always been rumors abt PC and SrK? Also it should be more believable about SRK being anti-India because he is known to have professional and personal relations with Tony Ashai, widely believed to be ISI agent?

Again what is good for gander is good for goose.

Originally posted by: hotchoco

All of this is beyond silly anyway. Is sexual harassment the only one that counts? What about other types of physical harassment? What about people like Salman Khan who a top actress has gone on record to say he assaulted her? Are people supposed to stop working with Salman now? And by working, I mean everything - not just movies but Big Boss and Dus Ka Dum and award shows and everything. How many people in the industry are going to stop working with him?

What about Amitabh? There are actresses who have alleged harassment from him too. How many people are going to stop working with Amitabh?

I'm sorry but this is ridiculous. You can't pass on responsibility from the people actually accused to one are completely unrelated to them and are just doing a movie or a show with them. Vivek Agnihotri is the actual accused and that's why he is questioned. Nobody bothered to say why is Anupam Kher working with an accused.

But then I expect nothing but stupidity from these tit-for-tat topics anyway.

More whataboutery.

Well despite being uninterested, i did manage to finish skimming the essay.

Why should only the actual accused be questioned and not the ones supporting him by working with him. Or You mean enablers shouldn't be questioned cos they are not the actual accused?

Glad that u didn't expect anything but stupidity but were still gracious enough to give your 2 cents. I'm truly humbled. 😊

Originally posted by: NathuPyare

More whataboutery.

Well despite being uninterested, i did manage to finish skimming the essay.

Why should only the actual accused be questioned and not the ones supporting him by working with him. Or You mean enablers shouldn't be questioned cos they are not the actual accused?

Glad that u didn't expect anything but stupidity but were still gracious enough to give your 2 cents. I'm truly humbled. 😊

You should have really stuck with your original dIdNT rEAd EsSaY response because this one is even funnier.

Look, I don't consider you capable of proper comprehension so it's pointless engaging with you. That is why I didn't quote you and only tagged Autumn-Rose because that's who I was talking to. But since you seem so interested in quoting me despite posing and posturing as "uninterested" let me indulge you for only one post.

Complaints about whataboutery don't fly from someone who made an entire whataboutery topic to save your darling Me-too accused Vivek Agnihotri. Nor should enabling be talked about by someone who lives in a glass house. Since you were paying money and doing so much promotion for Me-too accused Vivek Agnihotri, I think we can can definitely call that enabling. Are you saying you are free to enable me-too accused people but other people should be responsible and not enable me-too accused? Others should hold responsibility that you yourself refuse to? Or are rules different for you compared to others?

Vivek is a me-accused and will always be called out. Period. Hirani is a me-too accused and will always be called out. Period. Nobody else is responsible for anything related to them unless you also want to hold responsibility the way you want celebs like SRK to.

You can quote me a thousand times if you want but I won't respond so enjoy getting the last word. Bye!

Originally posted by: hotchoco

You should have really stuck with your original dIdNT rEAd EsSaY response because this one is even funnier.

Look, I don't consider you capable of proper comprehension so it's pointless engaging with you. That is why I didn't quote you and only tagged Autumn-Rose because that's who I was talking to. But since you seem so interested in quoting me despite posing and posturing as "uninterested" let me indulge you for only one post.

Complaints about whataboutery don't fly from someone who made an entire whataboutery topic to save your darling Me-too accused Vivek Agnihotri. Nor should enabling be talked about by someone who lives in a glass house. Since you were paying money and doing so much promotion for Me-too accused Vivek Agnihotri, I think we can can definitely call that enabling. Are you saying you are free to enable me-too accused people but other people should be responsible and not enable me-too accused? Others should hold responsibility that you yourself refuse to? Or are rules different for you compared to others?

Vivek is a me-accused and will always be called out. Period. Hirani is a me-too accused and will always be called out. Period. Nobody else is responsible for anything related to them unless you also want to hold responsibility the way you want celebs like SRK to.

You can quote me a thousand times if you want but I won't respond so enjoy getting the last word. Bye!

What can i say except curiosity killed the cat 😭

Thank you so much for indulging me once again I'm humbled once again. 😊

This topic was not made to save vivek but to question people supporting SRK who were blaming vivek in the other topic. Saving vivek was done in THAT topic itself.

I never knew i lived in a glass house. May be the glass is so good that it's virtually invisible. 🤔 But still it IS a conspiracy. 😳

I was promoting TKF not vivek Agnihotri and opposing everyone who were attacking TKF in the name of Vivek Agnihotri. Hope u can understand the difference.

I never said the accusations were true for both vivek and Srk hence the line "disgusting if true" in the topic. But some others were pretty keen to dismiss vivek based on those accusations itself so my question is for them- why are they enabling SRK by supporting him working with a metoo accused when they themselves were casting aspersions on TKF because its the work of a meToo accused?

If i was supporting TKF, thereby enabling vivek then I am ok with SRK working with Raju too (cos the accusations have yet not been proved) The question is - if you or other people were attacking TKF based on vivek's metoo allegations then why has ur stand changed for Srk enabling Hirani?

Yes I'm willing to enjoy having the last word. So gracious of you. Thanks😊