People gave standing Ovation - Page 13

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22

Actually, left-wingers call Sanghis 'Hindu terrorists'. And 'bhakt' is the same as 'Sanghi', I hope you know that. So yes, there's really no difference between left-wingers calling people 'bhakt/Sanghi' and right-wingers saying 'anti-national/terrorist sympathizers'.

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

You just added your interpretation to make calling someone a Bhakt the same as Terrorist sympathizer and antinational...u can try giving it a spin but no way are the two same...

Calling someone a bhakt and Sanghi ARE the same. There's no two ways around it, sorry. Leftists use these two words interchangeably all the time.

And to Leftists, Sanghis (RSS) are 'Hindu terrorists'. That's also a hard fact. Leftist intellectuals have gone on record saying it. It's not something I invented, so no use denying it.

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22

Actually, left-wingers call Sanghis 'Hindu terrorists'. And 'bhakt' is the same as 'Sanghi', I hope you know that. So yes, there's really no difference between left-wingers calling people 'bhakt/Sanghi' and right-wingers saying 'anti-national/terrorist sympathizers'.

Putting it mildly.. the buck doesn't end at being called bhakt, adhbhakt or IT cell.. these people would add words like jobless etc to further demean anyone holding opinion against theirs.

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22

Calling someone a bhakt and Sanghi ARE the same. There's no two ways around it, sorry. Leftists use these two words interchangeably all the time.

And to Leftists, Sanghis (RSS) are 'Hindu terrorists'. That's also a hard fact. Leftist intellectuals have gone on record saying it. It's not something I invented, so no use denying it.

again you are trying to do 2+2=5....not possible......calling some one a terrorist sympathizer and anti-national doesn't need any abba dabba jabba to explain what they are .....they mean exactly what the words mean...

Bhakt, andhbhakt jobless etc etc is not the same as antinational and terrorist sympathizer...which in my opinion is the worst kind of abuse...

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

again you are trying to do 2+2=5....not possible......calling some one a terrorist sympathizer and anti-national doesn't need any abba dabba jabba to explain what they are .....they mean exactly what the words mean...

What abba jabba? Calling someone a Hindu terrorist is different from saying 'terrorist sympathizer'? How?

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

Bhakt, andhbhakt jobless etc etc is not the same as antinational and terrorist sympathizer...which in my opinion is the worst kind of abuse...

That's your opinion. But calling someone jobless (apart from Hindu terrorist) is a very very personal insult. And some leftists are indeed apologists for terrorists and religious extremists. Maybe not you or some others here, but go on Twitter and you'll see 'woke, liberal' influencers trying to downplay the actions of terrorists and peddling apologia for them. It's real. Plenty of leftists and liberals are terrorist sympathizers indeed. And they call the other side as 'Hindutva terrorists'.

Being called Hindu terrorist is far worse.. than being called terrorist sympathizer

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22

That's your opinion. But calling someone jobless (apart from Hindu terrorist) is a very very personal insult. And some leftists are indeed apologists for terrorists and religious extremists. Maybe not you or some others here, but go on Twitter and you'll see 'woke, liberal' influencers trying to downplay the actions of terrorists and peddling apologia for them. It's real. Plenty of leftists and liberals are terrorist sympathizers indeed. And they call the other side as 'Hindutva terrorists'.

Again calling someone jobless may be an insult...but compare that to being a deshdrohi or terrorist sympathizer ...nothing is worse in my book and nothing can justify this kind of abuse...Im have heard....liberandus, sickulars, fake nationals....but nothing sounds as offensive...

For Hindus, mockery of the word "Bhakt" is just as offensive and this word gets thrown around and associated with many negative connotations!

If you're gonna name call others to cut off someone's opinion, then should be ready to reciprocation too!

What is worst is ofc a matter of subjectivity - So why not stop name calling others just because you don't like what they have to say? So much for shouting off the roof top about secularism, tolerance and liberalism when one can't even discuss without calling others Bhakts and what not!