Precap - Relationship Rights - Page 4

Originally posted by: janecastle

Who is being judgemental? I didn't know that people are not allowed to point out Anupama's shortcomings here. 🤪 I didn't say a word against Anupama stopping Rakhi from visiting Shahs. That was right. But Anupama or anyone else has no right to stop Kinjal from meeting her mother. Kinjal is not anyone's bloody property for them to decide or declare on her behalf.

People are allowed to express ur points. I found ur point too much like overcritisin.Anupama said something in the heat of moment which we know knowing Anupama nature she will not stop mother daughter meeting.

Originally posted by: Shiner

People are allowed to express ur points. I found ur point too much like overcritisin.Anupama said something in the heat of moment which we know knowing Anupama nature she will not stop mother daughter meeting.

Anupama kuch bhi aivey bolne wale logo mai se nahi hai ! Itni badi baat heat of moment mai anupama nahi bol sakti !

It proves she can go to any extent for Leela and can break mother-child relationship too for the sake of Leela ! It’s anupama’s blind love for her baa Leela !

I wish koi iss akkal se paidal anupama ko Leela ki reality realise karaye yah fir Aj jo clips as a proof post hue hai forum mai woh koi iss chamchi ko dikha kar hosh mai laye!

Leela ki doom kahi ki ! 😡

Originally posted by: Shiner

People are allowed to express ur points. I found ur point too much like overcritisin.Anupama said something in the heat of moment which we know knowing Anupama nature she will not stop mother daughter meeting.

Everyone is allowed to express their POVs. So I stated my opinion. You don't have to pass comments on that. If you found Anupama's reaction ok, that is POV. Doesn't mean I should have the same opinion.

Originally posted by: janecastle

Everyone is allowed to express their POVs. So I stated my opinion. You don't have to pass comments on that. If you found Anupama's reaction ok, that is POV. Doesn't mean I should have the same opinion.

I think anyone is allowed to quote or respond to others people point of view. People with different point of views have qouted me too above. That's all part of discussion. Isn't it ? I haven't asked to change urs.

I too did not like that part of Anupama’s dialogue. She can forbid Rakhee from coming to their house, but to prohibit Kinjal from visiting her mom was ridiculous. Kinjal maybe her daughter in law but she is not property and Kinjal can go meet her mom whenever she wants.

Did not like the Ganga Jal part either. Why is no one allowed to sit on the swing? And what was that haar? Ba’s mother’s haar? What was it doing on the swing? Would have made better sense if Rakhee had broken Ba’s japmala or something.

Originally posted by: soapwatcher1

I too did not like that part of Anupama’s dialogue. She can forbid Rakhee from coming to their house, but to prohibit Kinjal from visiting her mom was ridiculous. Kinjal maybe her daughter in law but she is not property and Kinjal can go meet her mom whenever she wants.

Did not like the Ganga Jal part either. Why is no one allowed to sit on the swing? And what was that haar? Ba’s mother’s haar? What was it doing on the swing? Would have made better sense if Rakhee had broken Ba’s japmala or something.

Right! Yesterday's episode was totally OTT. I am rather curious, when she will ask Toshu to leave his job and swift back from penthouse - stop being ghar jamai.

If she can take decision for Kinjal without asking her, why not include your son too.

Apparently, it was her mother's gift. But as per what I noticed, the necklace slipped from her hand didn't look intentional.

Originally posted by: Shiner

I think anyone is allowed to quote or respond to others people point of view. People with different point of views have qouted me too above. That's all part of discussion. Isn't it ? I haven't asked to change urs.

You could have made your point without passing comments like I am being judgmental or overreacting. Instead, you chose to make a personal attack. Anyone can quote others, but attacking other people's opinions is not cool.

I would have no problem if Anupama gathered guts enough to demand that Toshu stop going around licking his mother in law’s feet. Telling him he is no good and only a ghar jamai and has that position of his totally because of ehsaan and only because of being Rakhee’s son in law would actually bring Toshu a peg or two down and would be well deserved. As a mother especially as a mother scorned, Anupama has every right to tell her unworthy son off. Toshu will not listen to his mother but that is besides the point.

My only issue was Anupama declaring Kinjal cannot meet her mother. Anupama could have worded it differently, asked Kinjal if Kinjal wanted to keep relations with a woman like her mother since her mother is constantly wreaking havoc at Kinjal’s sasural. The same insult could have been dealt to Rakhee without making Kinjal a piece of property duty bound and subserviently obedient to the Shahs.

Yes, Ba’s ma’s haar, but why was Ba sitting with that haar? Didn’t make sense. The Ganga jal was mentioned by Vanraj and at first I thought he was exaggerating to insult his sambdhan. But Anupama acting on it was ludicrous. No wonder that old women, Ba, walks around queening and preening as if she was indeed the ruler of the house. Can’t stand the old woman. And can’t stand her husband (Bapuji) for not showing his wife her place, nose out of Anupama’s business.