Originally posted by: Autumn_Rose
#1 - As far as giving only muslim name goes - I think its parent's choice. Also I think being nawabs they have titles, like "shehzadi/shehzada".. so there is a chance they have to be muslims. (Even in royalty, even where we have evidence that Mugal wives were free to practice her own religion - the havan kunds and structure of Jodha's palace especially.. they had separate Islamic names too). Though the Pataudis came into existence during the British Era, if I'm not wrong.
#2 Weird and problematic.
Yeah, the Pataudis are truly as fake as it gets. They are not ancient nawabs or anything. The title was given to them by the British for being loyalists. They were sucking up to the The Raj when other Indians were fighting in the Independence struggle. 😆
On a personal level, they can give their kids Muslim names. Even if Kareena converted, that's their business and doesn't affect anyone else. But from a more general viewpoint, I don't think it's right to erase the wife/mother's identity in their children especially if you want to be seen as liberal and secular. There isn't anything progressive about this.
Lastly, being celebrities and then naming kids after conquerers is a very public jab. It is just insulting to the public they serve and make money from. See, if their first kid was Jehangir, I think the controversy would have been a lot less. But after already having Taimur and then do it again shows intent. They knew what they were doing and what the reactions were going to be. I don't think it can be passed off as 'oh it was just a nice sounding name' because nobody sensible would pull this twice unless they were making a statement on purpose.
6